首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Nanotechnology >Ordering technology, excluding society: the division of labour and sociotechnical order in images of converging technologies
【24h】

Ordering technology, excluding society: the division of labour and sociotechnical order in images of converging technologies

机译:有序技术,不包括社会:融合技术中的劳动分工和社会技术秩序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The convergence of nanotechnology with bio- and info- technologies and cognitive sciences (NBIC) and its discourse has been analysed mostly in terms of the dramatic social change that can possibly be induced, the disarticulation of the present sociotechnical order that can consequently be caused and the adjustments of societal and institutional arrangements that are considered necessary to cope with this transformative potential. The literature has paid less attention to the possible role of converging technologies (CT) and their discourse in reproducing the existing sociotechnical order and, in particular, a specific pattern of the current division of technoscientific labour that is consistent with the so-called technocratic logic in the relations between technoscience, government and society. Analysing the Italian daily press coverage of selected applications, we illustrate that the CT media discourse supports indeed such a division of labour, which assigns to scientists and technologists an almost exclusive social mandate to develop technologies and to decision-makers a supporting role, while there is little or no room for the public to discuss and be involved in R&D activities and science policy. The role of the collective belief in technical progress and of the rhetoric of technological promises in sustaining and legitimising such a division of labour is then examined.
机译:纳米技术与生物技术,信息技术和认知科学(NBIC)的融合及其论述主要是根据可能引起的巨大社会变化,可能导致的当前社会技术秩序的脱节以及为应对这种变革潜力而进行的必要的社会和体制安排调整。文献很少关注融合技术(CT)的可能作用及其在再现现有社会技术秩序方面的话语,尤其是当前技术科学劳动分工的一种特定模式,这种模式与所谓的技术官僚逻辑相一致。在技​​术科学,政府与社会之间的关系中。通过分析意大利每日对特定应用的新闻报道,我们可以看出,CT媒体话语确实支持了这样的分工,即分配给科学家和技术人员几乎排他的社会任务,以开发技术并为决策者提供辅助作用,而在那里公众讨论或参与研发活动和科学政策的空间很小或没有。然后研究了集体信念在技术进步中的作用以及技术承诺的修辞在维持和使这种分工合法化方面的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号