首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Radiology >Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography.
【24h】

Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography.

机译:比较接受常规放射线照相检查,传统的屏幕胶片放射照相,计算机放射照相和直接数字放射照相的患者的放射剂量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

New flat-panel direct digital radiography equipment has recently been installed in our Accident and Emergency Department; its characteristics and versatility are well suited to the work undertaken in this environment. The aim of this study was to compare radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations using conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography; entrance surface dose and effective dose were calculated for six standard examinations (a total of 10 projections) using standard patient exposure parameters for the three imaging modalities. It was found that doses for computed radiography (all examinations) were higher than the doses for the other two modalities; effective doses for direct digital radiography were approximately 29% and approximately 43% lower than those for screen-film radiography and computed radiography, respectively. The image quality met the criteria in the European guidelines for all modalities.
机译:我们的急症室最近安装了新的平板直接数字射线照相设备;它的特性和多功能性非常适合在这种环境下进行的工作。这项研究的目的是比较使用常规的屏幕胶片X射线照相,计算机射线照相和直接数字射线照相进行标准射线照相检查的患者的放射剂量;使用三种成像方式的标准患者暴露参数,针对六次标准检查(总共10个投影)计算了入口表面剂量和有效剂量。结果发现,计算机射线照相(所有检查)的剂量高于其他两种方式的剂量。直接数字射线照相的有效剂量分别比屏幕胶片射线照相和计算机射线照相的有效剂量低约29%和约43%。图像质量符合所有形式的欧洲准则中的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号