Cost-effectiveness of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: Extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort - The WHICH? study (Which Heart Failure Intervention Is Most Cost-Effective & Consumer Friendly in Reducing Hospital Care)

Maru Shoko; Byrnes Joshua; Carrington Melinda J.; Chan Yih-Kai; Thompson David R.; Stewart Simon; Scuffham Paul A.

首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Cost-effectiveness of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: Extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort - The WHICH? study (Which Heart Failure Intervention Is Most Cost-Effective & Consumer Friendly in Reducing Hospital Care)

【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: Extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort - The WHICH? study (Which Heart Failure Intervention Is Most Cost-Effective & Consumer Friendly in Reducing Hospital Care)

机译：家庭与临床治疗慢性心力衰竭的成本效益：实用，多中心随机试验队列的后续研究-WHICH？研究（在减少医院护理中，哪种心力衰竭干预措施最具成本效益和消费者友好性）

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Objective: To assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of two multidisciplinary management programs for elderly patients hospitalized with chronic heart failure (CHF) and how it is influenced by patient characteristics.

机译：目的：评估两种多学科管理计划对住院慢性心力衰竭（CHF）的老年患者的长期成本效果及其对患者特征的影响。

著录项

来源
《International Journal of Cardiology》 |2015年第null期|共8页
作者
Maru Shoko; Byrnes Joshua; Carrington Melinda J.; Chan Yih-Kai; Thompson David R.; Stewart Simon; Scuffham Paul A.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类心脏、血管（循环系）疾病;
关键词
Heart failure; Disease management; Cost effectiveness; Net monetary benefit; Economic evaluation;

机译：心力衰竭;疾病管理;成本效益;净货币收益;经济评估;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献

1. Cost-effectiveness of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: Extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort - The WHICH? study (Which Heart Failure Intervention Is Most Cost-Effective & Consumer Friendly in Reducing Hospital Care) [J] . Maru Shoko, Byrnes Joshua, Carrington Melinda J., International Journal of Cardiology . 2015,第Null期

机译：家庭与临床治疗慢性心力衰竭的成本效益：实用，多中心随机试验队列的后续研究-WHICH？研究（在减少医院护理中，哪种心力衰竭干预措施最具成本效益和消费者友好性）
2. Prolonged impact of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: Extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort [J] . StewartS., CarringtonM.J., HorowitzJ.D., International Journal of Cardiology . 2014,第3期

机译：家庭和诊所管理的慢性心力衰竭的长期影响：务实的多中心随机试验队列的扩展随访
3. Prolonged impact of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: Extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort [J] . StewartS., CarringtonM.J., HorowitzJ.D., International Journal of Cardiology . 2014,第3期

机译：家庭与诊所的慢性心力衰竭管理的长期影响：务实，多长期随机试验队列的延长后续行动
4. Home telemonitoring of chronic heart failure patients: novel system architecture of the home or hospital in heart failure study [C] . Pinna, G.D., Maestri, . 2003

机译：慢性心力衰竭患者的家庭远程监护：心力衰竭研究中家庭或医院的新型系统架构
5. Identifying priority learning needs to improve adherence to self-management regimens among individuals with chronic heart failure: Developing a clinic-based screening instrument. [D] . Mangan, Joan Mary C. 2003

机译：确定优先学习需要改善慢性心力衰竭患者对自我管理方案的依从性：开发基于临床的筛查工具。
6. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Rehabilitation Enablement in Chronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) facilitated self-care rehabilitation intervention in heart failure patients and caregivers: rationale and protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial [O] . R S Taylor, C Hayward, V Eyre, 2015

机译：慢性心力衰竭康复支持（REACH-HF）的临床有效性和成本效益促进了心力衰竭患者和护理人员的自我保健康复干预：一项多中心随机对照试验的原理和方案
7. Impact of Home Versus Clinic-Based Management of Chronic Heart Failure: The WHICH? (Which Heart Failure Intervention Is Most Cost-Effective & Consumer Friendly in Reducing Hospital Care) Multicenter, Randomized Trial [O] . Stewart, Simon, J. Carrington, Melinda, H. Marwick, Thomas, 2012

机译：家庭与基于临床的慢性心力衰竭管理的影响：WHICH？（在减少医院护理方面，哪种心力衰竭干预措施最具成本效益和消费者友好性）多中心随机试验

Cost-effectiveness of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: Extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort - The WHICH? study (Which Heart Failure Intervention Is Most Cost-Effective & Consumer Friendly in Reducing Hospital Care)

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅