首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Safety and feasibility of iliac endovascular interventions with a radial approach. Results from a multicenter study coordinated by the Italian Radial Force
【24h】

Safety and feasibility of iliac endovascular interventions with a radial approach. Results from a multicenter study coordinated by the Italian Radial Force

机译:radial动脉入路vascular骨腔内介入治疗的安全性和可行性。意大利径向力量协调进行的多中心研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Percutaneous angioplasty of lower limb disease is commonly performed with a transfemoral access. In the coronary field, a transradial approach has shown to reduce access-site bleeding and adverse clinical events. This route has not yet been well studied for the majority of peripheral interventions, like those involving the iliac arteries. In this study we sought to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this approach for iliac interventions. Methods Multicenter study was performed at high-volume centers with experience in transradial percutaneous interventions. Primary endpoint of the study was procedural success; secondary endpoints included in-hospital bleeding, 1-month freedom from adverse events and the rate of radial occlusion. Feasibility of this technique was evaluated by recording procedural and fluoroscopy time and contrast load. Results A total of 149 patients from 5 centers were enrolled. The population had a medium risk profile, with 48% of patients having TASC 2 or 3 lesions. Procedural success was achieved in 98.7% of the population, and we did not register in-hospital complications, including both vascular access site and procedural-related complications. An ancillary transfemoral approach was used in 13% of patients. One-month freedom from symptoms was achieved in 97.3% of patients, and the rate of radial occlusion was 2.7%. Major determinants of an unsuccessful procedure were the use of normal 6 or 7-Fr introducer with guiding catheter, TASC D lesion attempt, lesion length > 30 mm and total occlusion. Conclusions A transradial approach for iliac disease may be a feasible and safe alternative to the transfemoral route in experienced hands, in the light of significant technical improvements and dedicated devices.
机译:背景技术下肢疾病的经皮血管成形术通常是通过股骨入路进行的。在冠状动脉领域,经radi动脉途径已显示可减少进入部位的出血和不良临床事件。对于大多数外周干预,如涉及involving动脉的干预,尚未对该路径进行很好的研究。在这项研究中,我们试图评估这种方法对骨干预的可行性和安全性。方法多中心研究是在大量经皮经皮介入治疗中心进行的。该研究的主要终点是手术成功。次要终点包括医院内出血,1个月无不良事件发生和radial骨闭塞率。通过记录程序和荧光检查时间以及造影剂负荷来评估该技术的可行性。结果共招募了来自5个中心的149例患者。该人群具有中等风险,其中48%的患者患有TASC 2或3个病变。手术成功率达到了98.7%,而且我们没有记录医院内并发症,包括血管通路部位和与程序相关的并发症。辅助经股动脉入路用于13%的患者。 97.3%的患者实现了一个月的无症状症状,of骨闭塞率为2.7%。不成功手术的主要决定因素是使用带导向导管的正常6或7-Fr导引管,TASC D病变尝试,病变长度> 30 mm和完全闭塞。结论鉴于重大的技术进步和专用设备,经experienced骨入路治疗experienced骨疾病可能是经验丰富的双手经股动脉入路的一种可行且安全的替代选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号