首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Two-year survival and neurological outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients rescued by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
【24h】

Two-year survival and neurological outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients rescued by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

机译:体外循环心肺复苏术挽救院内心脏骤停患者的两年生存率和神经系统结局

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background The clinical benefit of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) has been proved in short-term follow-up studies. However, the benefit of E-CPR beyond 1 year has been not known. We investigated 2-year outcome of patients who received E-CPR or conventional CPR (C-CPR). Methods We analyzed a total of 406 adult in-hospital cardiac arrest victims who underwent CPR for more than 10 min from 2003 to 2009. The two-year survival and neurological outcome of E-CPR (n = 85) and C-CPR (n = 321) were compared using propensity score-matched analysis. Results The 2-year survival with minimal neurological impairment was 4-fold higher in the E-CPR group than the C-CPR group (23.5% versus 5.9%, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.43-0.75, p < 0.001) by unadjusted analysis. After propensity-score matching, it was still 4-fold higher in the E-CPR group than the C-CPR group (20.0% versus 5.0%, HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.36-0.80, p = 0.002). In the E-CPR group, the independent predictors associated with minimal neurological impairment were age ≤ 65 years (HR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.26-0.81; p = 0.008), CPR duration ≤ 35 min (HR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.18-0.76; p = 0.007), and subsequent cardiovascular intervention including coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (HR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.18-0.68; p = 0.002). Conclusions The initial survival benefit of E-CPR for cardiac arrest patients persisted at 2 years.
机译:背景技术短期随访研究已证明了体外心肺复苏(E-CPR)的临床益处。但是,E-CPR超过1年的收益尚不明确。我们调查了接受E-CPR或常规CPR(C-CPR)的患者的2年结局。方法我们分析了2003年至2009年共406例接受CPR超过10分钟的成人住院心脏骤停患者。E-CPR(n = 85)和C-CPR(n = 321)使用倾向得分匹配分析进行比较。结果E-CPR组的2年生存率和最小的神经系统损伤比C-CPR组高4倍(23.5%比5.9%,危险比(HR)= 0.57,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.43-0.75,p <0.001),未经调整的分析。倾向得分匹配后,E-CPR组仍比C-CPR组高4倍(20.0%对5.0%,HR = 0.53,95%CI = 0.36-0.80,p = 0.002)。在E-CPR组中,与最小神经功能缺损相关的独立预测因素是年龄≤65岁(HR = 0.46; 95%CI = 0.26-0.81; p = 0.008),CPR持续时间≤35 min(HR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.18-0.76; p = 0.007),以及随后的包括冠脉介入或心脏手术在内的心血管干预(HR = 0.36; 95%CI = 0.18-0.68; p = 0.002)。结论E-CPR对心脏骤停患者的初始生存获益持续2年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号