...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of geriatric psychiatry >Remission in major depression: results from a geriatric primary care population.
【24h】

Remission in major depression: results from a geriatric primary care population.

机译:重度抑郁症的缓解:老年基层医疗人群的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: While a recent task force report recommended that remission from major depression be defined according to DSM criteria, most previous work has used depressive symptom rating scales. The current study sought to identify baseline factors associated with treatment outcome in major depression, diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria. METHODS: Data from the Primary Care Research in Substance Abuse and Mental Health for the Elderly (PRISM-E) study were utilized. This analysis focused on 792 geriatric primary care patients with major depression at baseline, which was randomized to services by a mental health professional in primary care or specialty settings. Major depression was diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria based on a structured interview at baseline and 6 months. The primary outcome was the absence of any DSM-IV depressive disorder at six-month follow-up. Association with baseline demographic characteristics, comorbid anxiety disorder, 'at risk' drinking, number of co-occurring medical conditions, and depressive symptom severity was examined using multiple logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Remission occurred in 228 (29%) patients with completed follow-up assessments, while 564 (71%) did not remit. Factors which increased the odds of non-remission included comorbid anxiety (OR=1.60, 95% CI 1.11-2.31), female sex (OR=1.49, 95% CI 1.04-2.15), general medical comorbidity (OR=1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.24), and increased baseline depressive symptom severity (OR=1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: The findings underscore the importance of using DSM criteria to define remission from major depression, and suggest that concurrent measurement of depression severity, comorbid anxiety, and medical comorbidity are important in identifying patients requiring targeted interventions to optimize remission from major depression.
机译:目的:尽管最近的一个工作组报告建议根据DSM标准定义重度抑郁症的缓解,但大多数以前的工作都使用了抑郁症状等级量表。当前的研究试图确定与重度抑郁症的治疗结果相关的基线因素,根据DSM-IV标准进行诊断。方法:利用了老年人药物滥用和心理健康的初级保健研究(PRISM-E)研究的数据。该分析集中于792名基线时患有严重抑郁症的老年初级保健患者,该患者由初级保健或专科机构中的精神卫生专业人员随机分配。根据基线和6个月时的结构化访谈,根据DSM-IV标准诊断出严重抑郁症。主要结果是在六个月的随访中没有任何DSM-IV抑郁症。使用多元逻辑回归模型检查了与基线人口统计学特征,合并症,焦虑症,“有危险”的饮酒,同时发生的医疗状况以及抑郁症状严重程度的关系。结果:完成随访评估的228例患者(29%)缓解,而未缓解的564例(71%)。增加不缓解几率的因素包括合并症焦虑症(OR = 1.60,95%CI 1.11-2.31),女性(OR = 1.49,95%CI 1.04-2.15),普通医疗合并症(OR = 1.15,95% CI 1.07-1.24)和基线抑郁症状严重程度增加(OR = 1.04,95%CI 1.03-1.06)。结论:研究结果强调了使用DSM标准定义重度抑郁症缓解的重要性,并建议同时测量抑郁症严重程度,合并症焦虑症和医学合并症对确定需要针对性干预以优化重度抑郁症缓解的患者很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号