首页> 外文期刊>International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology. >High-dose inhaled flunisolide versus budesonide in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations in preschool-age children
【24h】

High-dose inhaled flunisolide versus budesonide in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations in preschool-age children

机译:大剂量吸入氟尼泊利与布地奈德治疗学龄前儿童急性哮喘急性发作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The role of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma exacerbation is debated. We compared high doses of nebulized budesonide versus high doses of nebulized flunisolide, in association with a short-acting beta-2-agonist, in the treatment of moderate asthma exacerbation in preschool children. In this randomized, parallel group, simple blind study, 46 children aged between 3 and 5 years affected by an acute moderate asthma attack were treated with nebulized flunisolide (Group 1) 40 μg/kg twice daily for 7 days and then 20 μg/kg twice daily for 14 days, or with nebulized budesonide (Group 2) 0.5 mg twice daily for 7 days then 0.25 mg twice daily for 15 days. Inhaled salbutamol (MDI+ spacer - 200 μg 4 times daily) was administered during the first 3 days of the study and then as needed. At T0, T7 and T21 days, airway resistances were evaluated with the forced oscillation technique before and after inhalation of inhaled salbutamol (200 mcg). Parents recorded symptoms and drug use on a diary card. Forty children completed the study. Airway resistances were significantly reduced at T7 (p< 0.01 flunisolide; p< 0.05 budesonide) and T21 (p< 0.05 flunisolide; p< 0.05 budesonide) versus TO in both groups, although at T7 the reduction occurred faster in group 1 than in group 2 (p<0.01). During the first 7 days of treatment, symptom scores decreased in both groups; however, the decrease was greater in group 1 (p< 0.05). High doses of inhaled flunisolide and budesonide are both effective in the management of moderate asthma exacerbations in pre-school-age children, but the flunisolide therapeutic effect was faster than budesonide.
机译:吸入皮质类固醇在哮喘急性发作中的作用尚有争议。我们比较了高剂量雾化布地奈德和高剂量雾化氟尼松与一种短效β-2-激动剂在学龄前儿童中度哮喘急性发作的疗效。在该随机平行分组的简单盲研究中,对46例受中度急性哮喘发作影响的3至5岁儿童进行雾化固体雾化治疗(第1组),每日两次,每次40μg/ kg,持续7天,然后每天20μg/ kg每天两次,共14天,或雾化布地奈德(第2组)每天0.5 mg,连续7天,然后0.25 mg,每天两次,连续15天。在研究的前三天,然后根据需要服用吸入的沙丁胺醇(MDI +间隔物-200μg,每天4次)。在T0,T7和T21天,在吸入沙丁胺醇(200 mcg)之前和之后,采用强制振荡技术评估气道阻力。父母在日记卡上记录症状和吸毒情况。 40名儿童完成了研究。在T7组(p <0.01氟尼松; p <0.05布地奈德)和T21(p <0.05氟尼松; p <0.05布地奈德)与TO相比,气道阻力显着降低,尽管在T7组1的降低比组快。 2(p <0.01)。在治疗的前7天内,两组的症状评分均下降。然而,第1组的下降更大(p <0.05)。大剂量吸入氟尼松和布地奈德均能有效控制学龄前儿童的中度哮喘发作,但氟尼松的治疗效果比布地奈德快。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号