...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics >Subjective response to seated fore-and-aft direction whole-body vibration
【24h】

Subjective response to seated fore-and-aft direction whole-body vibration

机译:对坐着的前后方向全身振动的主观反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Subjective response to seated, fore-and-aft direction, whole-body vibration of the type experienced in automobiles was investigated. Fore-and-aft acceleration was measured at the seat guide of a small automobile when driving over two representative road surfaces, and was replicated in a laboratory setting using a whole-body vibration test rig and rigid seat. A single 15 s section of each of the two acceleration time histories was band-pass filtered to the frequency interval from 0.5 to 50.5 Hz, and was used as a base stimulus. Thirteen test stimuli were then constructed for each base stimulus by rescaling to BS 6841 W{sub}d frequency-weighted r.m.s. amplitudes from 0.01 to 0.86 m/s{sup}2. Two groups of 16 participants (8 male and 8 female in each case) rated the discomfort of the test stimuli. The first group was asked to use the psychophysical method of magnitude estimation while the second used a Borg CR-10 scale. The order of presentation of the test stimuli was fully randomised and each was repeated three times. For each group of participants, regression analysis was used to determine both the individual and the group mean Stevens' Power Law exponent describing the relationship between stimulus amplitude and subjective response. All mean power exponents were found to be less than unity, with the CR-10 scale having produced smaller exponents than magnitude estimation. The power exponents ranged from 0.66 to 0.91, corroborating the value of 0.84 obtainable from the guidelines of standard BS 6841. The results suggest that the numerical response scale provided in the BS 6841 guidelines is appropriate for use in the case of automobile fore-and-aft vibration, but that the semantic labels under-represent the actual human subjective response in this direction. Psychophysical test method, vibration stimulus range and test participant gender were all found to affect the Stevens' Power Law exponent achieved from subjective testing. Each factor may therefore require control when attempting to compare human responses to vibration originating from different automobiles.
机译:研究了对坐着的前后方向的主观反应,即在汽车中遇到的那种全身振动。当在两个有代表性的路面上行驶时,在小型汽车的座椅导向装置上测量前后加速度,并在实验室中使用全身振动试验台和刚性座椅进行模拟。将两个加速时间历史中的每一个的15 s部分进行带通滤波至0.5至50.5 Hz的频率间隔,并将其用作基本刺激。然后,通过重新缩放至BS 6841 W {sub} d频率加权r.m.s,为每个基本刺激构建13个测试刺激。幅度从0.01到0.86 m / s {sup} 2。两组共16名参与者(每种情况下分别为8名男性和8名女性)评估了测试刺激的不适感。第一组被要求使用心理物理量值估计方法,而第二组则使用Borg CR-10量表。测试刺激的呈现顺序是完全随机的,每个重复三遍。对于每组参与者,均使用回归分析来确定描述刺激幅度与主观反应之间关系的史蒂文斯幂定律指数的个体和群体均值。发现所有平均功率指数均小于1,而CR-10标度产生的指数小于幅度估计。幂指数范围从0.66到0.91,证实了可从BS 6841标准指南获得的0.84值。结果表明,BS 6841指南中提供的数值响应量表适用于汽车前后行驶。后部振动,但语义标签不足以代表此方向上实际的人类主观反应。研究发现,心理物理测试方法,振动刺激范围和测试参与者的性别都会影响主观测试获得的史蒂文斯幂定律指数。因此,在尝试比较人类对来自不同汽车的振动的反应时,可能需要控制每个因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号