首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics >Kansei assessment of the constituent elements and the overall interrelations in car steering wheel design
【24h】

Kansei assessment of the constituent elements and the overall interrelations in car steering wheel design

机译:Kansei对汽车方向盘设计中的构成元素和整体相互关系的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In most studies on Kansei, the product form analysis model is based on the external features or elements of the product components. However, such an approach cannot completely convert consumer emotional perceptions into design elements. Therefore, this study combined the ergonomic technology used in Kansei engineering with the unique cognitive ability of humans to identify patterns and establish an emotional perception model that can integrate the overall interrelations of the constituent elements. Steering wheel design was used as the object of examination. Three types of adjectives were applied to describe the constituent elements. The first type was esthetic factors and involve external esthetics. The second type comprised two pairs of adjectives, sturdy/delicate and lightweight/heavy, called operational strength factors because they relate to form and strength. The third type comprised simplistic/changeful and artificial/spontaneous, called modernity factors because they pertain to the modern sense of beauty of the parts. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to construct a Kansei engineering model and compare the performance of individual elements and the product as a whole. The results show that the R-2 values in the overall model were greater than those in the element-oriented model, indicating that the integrated model outperformed the element-oriented model in variance explanation. The differences between the numerical values of the adjective pairs classic/fashionable (esthetic factors), sturdy/delicate (operational strength factors), and simplistic/changeful and artificial/spontaneous (modernity factors) were significant, demonstrating that the overall model is useful in predicting how consumers make assessments according to emotional perceptions. The R-2 increase of the modernity factors was the most obvious, indicating that the overall model assesses modernity more accurately. Comparing results and verifying test samples demonstrated that the overall model is more useful in predicting consumer appraisals that are based on emotional perception.
机译:在关西的大多数研究中,产品形态分析模型都是基于产品组件的外部特征或元素。但是,这种方法无法将消费者的情感观念完全转换为设计元素。因此,本研究将在Kansei工程中使用的人体工程学技术与人类独特的认知能力相结合,以识别模式并建立可以整合构成要素的整体相互关系的情感感知模型。方向盘设计被用作检查对象。三种形容词被用来描述构成要素。第一类是美学因素,涉及外部美学。第二类包括两对形容词,坚固/细腻和轻巧/沉重,因为它们与形状和强度有关,因此被称为操作强度因子。第三类包括简单/多变和人为/自发的,称为现代性因素,因为它们与零件的现代美感有关。多元线性回归分析用于构建Kansei工程模型,并比较单个元素和整个产品的性能。结果表明,总体模型中的R-2值大于面向元素的模型中的R-2值,表明在方差解释中,集成模型优于面向元素的模型。形容词对经典/时尚(审美因素),坚固/精致(操作强度因素),简单/变化和人为/自发(现代性因素)的数值之间的差异是显着的,表明总体模型可用于预测消费者如何根据情感感知进行评估。 R-2对现代性因素的增加最为明显,表明总体模型更准确地评估了现代性。比较结果和验证测试样本表明,总体模型在基于情感感知的消费者评估预测中更有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号