...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics >Ergonomic evaluation of the effects of handle types on garden tools
【24h】

Ergonomic evaluation of the effects of handle types on garden tools

机译:人体工学评估手柄类型对园林工具的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate quantitatively the effects of handle types of garden tools on ergonomic effectiveness, user satisfaction in terms of work performance, and subjective judgment of tactile feel and control. Shovelingperformance, hand grip force and electromyography (EMG), task workload, and subjective ratings of perceived exertion were measured while using three types of garden tasks/tools (shovel, rake, and hoe) with three different handle types: a conventional wood handle and two more fiberglass handle. The most effective measure for shovels was the relative efficiency of shovel performance, that is, shovel performance divided by task workload. A hollow fiberglass handle was 12% more efficient than either a wood orsolid fiberglass handle. The grip force and EMG analyses showed a similar effect, with a solid or hollow fiberglass handle requiring significantly less effort than a wood handle. Subjective ratings of the perceived exertion were also lowest for a hollowfiberglass handle. A hollow fiberglass handle showed better physiological efficiency and better subjective acceptability for comfort, tactile feel, and decreased slipperiness
机译:这项研究的目的是定量评估园林工具的手柄类型对人体工程学有效性,用户对工作表现的满意度以及对触觉和控制的主观判断的影响。使用三种类型的花园任务/工具(铲子,耙子和头)使用三种不同的手柄类型,测量铲铲的性能,手握力和肌电图(EMG),任务的工作量以及主观感觉的劳累程度,这是常规木柄和还有两个玻璃纤维手柄。铲子最有效的衡量标准是铲子性能的相对效率,即铲子性能除以任务工作量。中空玻璃纤维手柄的效率比木质或实心玻璃纤维手柄高12%。握力和EMG分析显示出类似的效果,实心或中空的玻璃纤维手柄比木质手柄所需的力明显更少。中空玻璃纤维手柄的主观感觉评分也最低。中空的玻璃纤维手柄显示出更好的生理效率和更好的主观接受度,以提供舒适感,触感和减少的滑爽感

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号