首页> 外文期刊>International journal of human-computer studies >Graphical representation in graphical dialodgue
【24h】

Graphical representation in graphical dialodgue

机译:图形对话中的图形表示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper explores the influence of communicative interaction on the form of graphical representations. A referential communication task is described which involves exclusively graphical dialogue. In this task subjects communicate about pieces of music by drawing. The drawings produced fall into two basic types: Abstract and Figurative. Three hypotheses are developed about the factors influencing the use of these drawing types: efficiency of production, suitability for the task and level of communicative interaction. Experimental evidence is presented which indicates that the drawing types do not differ in the amount of effort required to produce them. The results indicate that (1) Abstract drawings are more effective than Figurative drawings for comparative tasks and (2) a key constraint on their use is level of direct communicative interaction. It is argued that these observations result from differences in the underlying semantic models of music associated with the drawing types and the consequences these differences have for communicative coordination. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. [References: 27]
机译:本文探讨了交流互动对图形表示形式的影响。描述了一个参考通信任务,其中仅涉及图形对话。在此任务中,受试者通过绘画交流有关音乐的片段。生成的图纸分为两种基本类型:抽象和具象。关于影响使用这些图纸类型的因素,提出了三个假设:生产效率,任务的适用性和沟通互动的水平。提供了实验证据,表明图纸类型在生产图纸所需的工作量上没有差异。结果表明:(1)对于比较任务,抽象图比图形图更有效;(2)使用抽象图时,主要的限制因素是直接沟通互动的程度。有人认为,这些观察结果是由于与绘画类型相关的基本音乐语义模型的差异以及这些差异对交流协调的影响。 (C)2002 Elsevier ScienceLtd。保留所有权利。 [参考:27]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号