...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hyperthermia: The official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group >Toxicities associated with hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion and isolated limb infusion in the treatment of melanoma and sarcoma.
【24h】

Toxicities associated with hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion and isolated limb infusion in the treatment of melanoma and sarcoma.

机译:高温隔离肢体灌注和隔离肢体灌注在黑色素瘤和肉瘤治疗中的毒性作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) and isolated limb infusion (ILI) may play a significant role in the treatment of patients with recurrent or in transit extremity melanoma or sarcoma that is unresectable. These procedures may be indicated when patients are otherwise faced with the possibility of a debilitating amputation. Not entirely benign treatment modalities, HILP and ILI can be associated with regional and systemic toxicities. We conducted a literature search of published studies using HILP and ILI for the treatment of extremity sarcomas and melanomas, and associated toxicities was performed. The regional toxicities of HILP and ILI are similar. The most common toxicities reported are mild to moderate. However, when severe regional toxicity occurs, albeit infrequently (<5%), fasciotomies or even amputation may be necessary. Some studies have showed a relationship between acute regional toxicities and long term regional morbidity. Systemic toxicity appears to be more frequent when TNF-alpha is used in combination with other drugs during HILP, however the use of TNF-alpha in the United States is limited to trials. Although regional toxicities are similar, systemic toxicity of ILI is minimal compared to HILP. ILI is easier to repeat, technically less complex, and may be more acceptable in infirmed patients. Long term morbidity and outcomes for ILI are still being evaluated. Both of these techniques may be suitable options in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent, or in transit extremity melanoma or sarcoma.
机译:高温隔离肢体灌注(HILP)和隔离肢体灌注(ILI)可能在无法切除的复发性或转运性肢体黑色素瘤或肉瘤患者中起重要作用。当患者面临截肢失败的可能性时,可能会指示这些程序。并非完全良性的治疗方式,HILP和ILI可能与区域和全身毒性有关。我们对使用HILP和ILI治疗肢体肉瘤和黑色素瘤的已发表研究进行了文献检索,并进行了相关毒性试验。 HILP和ILI的区域毒性相似。报告的最常见的毒性是轻度到中度。但是,当发生严重的区域毒性反应时(尽管很少(<5%)),可能需要进行筋膜切开术甚至截肢。一些研究表明,急性区域毒性与长期区域发病率之间存在关系。当在HILP期间将TNF-α与其他药物联合使用时,全身毒性似乎更为频繁,但是在美国,TNF-α的使用仅限于试验。尽管区域毒性相似,但与HILP相比,ILI的全身毒性很小。 ILI更容易重复,从技术上讲不那么复杂,在病弱的患者中可能更容易接受。 ILI的长期发病率和结局仍在评估中。对于无法切除的晚期或复发性患者,或在运输中的四肢黑色素瘤或肉瘤患者,这两种技术都是合适的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号