首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control >A comparative process study of chemical-looping combustion (CLC) and chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) for solid fuels
【24h】

A comparative process study of chemical-looping combustion (CLC) and chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) for solid fuels

机译:固体燃料化学循环燃烧(CLC)和氧解偶联化学循环(CLOU)的比较过程研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A solid-fuel combustion system based on chemical-looping combustion (CLC) and chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) has the potential to assist in the capture of CO2 from coal-fired power plants. In both processes an air separation unit is not required, and the flue gas streams from CLC and CLOU contain primarily carbon dioxide and water, which facilitates CO2 capture. CLOU offers a potential advantage for solid fuels as it uses combustion reactions. The O-2 for the combustion reactions in CLOU is supplied from the reduction of a metal oxide (e.g. CuO). Iron-based materials are being considered for oxygen carriers in CLC, wherein the coal is gasified, and subsequently the product gas is oxidized to CO2 and H2O by reaction with the circulating oxygen carrier. CLOU affords faster coal char oxidation reaction rates, as compared to CLC coal gasification reactions, but CuO-based materials for CLOU will necessarily be more expensive. Furthermore, the stability of CuO-based oxygen carrier materials is also an important concern. In this paper, ASPEN PLUS process engineering models were developed for combustion of a Wyoming Powder River Basin coal using an iron-based oxygen carrier for CLC and a copper-based oxygen carrier for CLOU. The objective of these process models was to evaluate the material and energy requirements for a process development unit by incorporating insights from previously reported kinetic studies on laboratory scale units. A relative economic analysis has also been performed to address key technical challenges which will subsequently help in addressing the development of CLC and CLOU for solid fuels. Due to slower char gasification reaction times, CLC requires a larger reactor, which results in a relatively higher capital cost. It also manifests in a higher pressure drop and consequently higher energy costs for fluidizing the oxygen carrier
机译:基于化学循环燃烧(CLC)和氧解偶联化学循环(CLOU)的固体燃料燃烧系统具有帮助捕集燃煤电厂CO2的潜力。在这两个过程中均不需要空气分离装置,并且来自CLC和CLOU的烟道气主要包含二氧化碳和水,这有助于捕集CO2。 CLOU利用燃烧反应为固体燃料提供了潜在的优势。 CLOU中用于燃烧反应的O-2由金属氧化物(例如CuO)的还原提供。在CLC中考虑将铁基材料用作氧载体,其中将煤气化,然后通过与循环的氧载体反应将产物气氧化成CO 2和H 2O。与CLC煤气化反应相比,CLOU提供了更快的煤焦氧化反应速率,但CLOU的基于CuO的材料必定会更昂贵。此外,基于CuO的氧载体材料的稳定性也是重要的考虑因素。在本文中,开发了ASPEN PLUS工艺工程模型,用于怀俄明粉末河盆地煤的燃烧,其中CLC使用铁基氧气载体,CLOU使用铜基氧气载体。这些过程模型的目的是通过结合先前报道的实验室规模动力学研究得出的见解,评估过程开发单元的材料和能源需求。还进行了相对经济分析来应对关键技术挑战,这些挑战随后将有助于解决固体燃料的CLC和CLOU的发展。由于较慢的焦炭气化反应时间,CLC需要更大的反应器,这导致相对较高的投资成本。它还表现出更高的压降,因此流化氧气载体的能源成本更高

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号