首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Fracture >Choosing a proper loading rate for bonded-particle model of intact rock
【24h】

Choosing a proper loading rate for bonded-particle model of intact rock

机译:为完整岩石的粘结颗粒模型选择合适的加载速率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bonded-particle model (BPM) is widely used to model geomaterials, in which calibration against the results from uniaxial/triaxial compressive tests, Brazilian tensile tests and shear tests have been commonly conducted. However, since different loading rates were used, it is difficult to assess the numerical results of these studies if the effects of the loading rate are ignored. This paper discusses the loading mechanisms associated with different loading rates in the BPM and examines the numerical outputs under these different rates. The results indicate that the time step is an important factor controlling the loading rate of the BPM and should be considered in addition to the velocity of the loading platen. The strain rate, which is usually employed to describe the loading rate in a physical test, cannot be used for the direct comparison of different numerical tests in PFC2D due to the time step. A proposed "step strain rate", which considers the time step, is found to be more appropriate for comparing the loading velocity on specimens of varying sizes. Six different loading rates (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.08, 0.2 and 0.6m/s) are employed in uniaxial compressive tests and Brazilian tests during this study. After comprehensive examinations, a maximum step strain rate of 1.1 x 10~(-8)step~(-1) is considered to be appropriate for quasi-static uniaxial compressive tests and Brazilian tests using the BPM.
机译:粘结颗粒模型(BPM)广泛用于对土工材料进行建模,其中通常针对单轴/三轴压缩试验,巴西拉伸试验和剪切试验的结果进行校准。但是,由于使用了不同的加载速率,因此如果忽略加载速率的影响,则很难评估这些研究的数值结果。本文讨论了与BPM中不同加载速率相关的加载机制,并研究了在这些不同加载速率下的数值输出。结果表明,时间步长是控制BPM加载速率的重要因素,除了加载压板的速度外,还应考虑时间步长。由于时间步长,通常用于描述物理测试中加载速率的应变率不能用于直接比较PFC2D中的不同数值测试。提出了一种考虑了时间步长的“步长应变率”,它更适合比较大小不同的试样的加载速度。在此研究期间,单轴压缩测试和巴西测试采用了六种不同的加载速率(0.005、0.01、0.02、0.08、0.2和0.6m / s)。经过全面检查,对于准静态单轴压缩试验和使用BPM的巴西试验,最大阶梯应变率为1.1 x 10〜(-8)step〜(-1)被认为是合适的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号