首页> 外文期刊>British journal of ophthalmology >Vitrectomy and gas for inferior break retinal detachments: are the results comparable to vitrectomy, gas, and scleral buckle?
【24h】

Vitrectomy and gas for inferior break retinal detachments: are the results comparable to vitrectomy, gas, and scleral buckle?

机译:玻璃体切割术和气体治疗下视网膜脱离:结果与玻璃体切割术,气体和巩膜扣相比可比吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: To compare the success rates of vitrectomy and gas with vitrectomy, gas, and buckle in the treatment of inferior break retinal detachments. METHODS: A retrospective case note review of 86 patients who presented with inferior break retinal detachments was carried out. An inferior break was defined as a horseshoe tear present between 4 and 8 o'clock. Patients were analysed in two groups; group A consisted of 41 patients who underwent a vitrectomy and gas, group B consisted of 45 patients who underwent a vitrectomy, gas, and scleral buckle. The features of the retinal detachment, peroperative and postoperative complications, and outcomes of treatment were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: The primary anatomical success rate at 3 months was 89% in group A versus 73% in group B (p = 0.11). There was no statistical difference in the complication rate between the two groups (p = 0.819). The most common cause of treatment failure was proliferative vitreoretinopathy, 20% (n = 9) in group B compared with5% (n = 2) in group A and this reached statistical significance (p = 0.0159). There was a higher rate of epiretinal membrane development in group B (p = 0.0004). The final attachment rate was not statistically different between the two groups, 95% (39) in group A and 93% (42) in group B (p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy and gas without the application of a scleral buckle may be used to safely treat inferior break retinal detachments. It may be used as an alternative to vitrectomy, gas, and buckle which has an increased risk of choroidal haemorrhage, requires a longer operating time, and has all the associated complications of a scleral buckle.
机译:目的:比较玻璃体切割术和气体治疗与玻璃体切割术,气体和屈曲术治疗下眼底视网膜脱离的成功率。方法:回顾性分析86例视网膜下裂脱离患者的病历。下休息时间定义为4点至8点之间出现的马蹄形撕裂。对患者进行了两组分析。 A组由41例行玻璃体切除术和气体切除术的患者组成,B组由45例经玻璃体切除术,气体和巩膜扣术的患者组成。记录每位患者的视网膜脱离,围手术期和术后并发症以及治疗结果的特征。结果:A组3个月的主要解剖成功率为89%,而B组为73%(p = 0.11)。两组之间的并发症发生率无统计学差异(p = 0.819)。治疗失败的最常见原因是增生性玻璃体视网膜病变,B组为20%(n = 9),而A组为5%(n = 2),达到统计学意义(p = 0.0159)。 B组的视网膜前膜发育率较高(p = 0.0004)。两组的最终依恋率无统计学差异,A组为95%(39),B组为93%(42)(p = 1.0)。结论:不用巩膜带扣的玻璃体切割术和气体可以安全地治疗下眼底视网膜脱离。它可以用作玻璃体切除术,气体和带扣的替代方法,玻璃体切除术,充气和带扣的脉络膜出血风险增加,需要更长的手术时间并具有巩膜带扣的所有相关并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号