...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development >Implications of local peoples' preferences in terms of income source and land use for Indonesia's national REDD-plus policy: evidence in East Kalimantan, Indonesia
【24h】

Implications of local peoples' preferences in terms of income source and land use for Indonesia's national REDD-plus policy: evidence in East Kalimantan, Indonesia

机译:当地人民在收入来源和土地使用方面的偏好对印度尼西亚国家REDD-plus政策的影响:印度尼西亚东加里曼丹省的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article tries to reveal the field reality in East Kalimantan, especially the preferences of villagers in terms of income source and land use, to ascertain the implications for Indonesia's national REDD-plus policy or one of the emerging regimes under UNFCCC. In forest lands, the villagers have no expectations for labour opportunities involving logging and planting trees in concession areas. In non-forest lands, villagers want to continue practicing swidden agriculture, to expand traditional rubber gardens, and to develop commercialised rubber plantations. They also think that rattan gardens and orchards are important. In order to suppress competition over land used for coal mining and oil palm plantations, to ensure villagers' rights to resources, and to conserve natural resources, it is recommended that Indonesia introduce programmes to support, as REDD-plus activities, the sustainable management of remaining forest and forest-like land uses such as orchards, rattan gardens, and traditional rubber gardens. This study shows the importance of not confining one's perspective to the REDD-plus policy framework determined by the government, but rather evaluating it by checking actual conditions in the field to aid constructive discussion.
机译:本文试图揭示东加里曼丹的实地现实,尤其是村民在收入来源和土地使用方面的偏好,以确定对印度尼西亚的国家REDD-plus政策或UNFCCC之下的新兴制度之一的影响。在林地中,村民对在特许区砍伐和植树等劳动机会没有期望。在非林地,村民们希望继续从事水耕农业,扩大传统橡胶园并发展商业化的橡胶种植园。他们还认为藤花园和果园很重要。为了抑制对用于煤炭开采和油棕种植的土地的竞争,确保村民的资源权和保护自然资源,建议印度尼西亚引入计划,作为REDD-plus活动的一部分,以支持印尼的可持续管理。其余的森林和类似森林的土地利用,例如果园,藤制花园和传统的橡胶花园。这项研究表明,重要的是不要将自己的观点局限于政府确定的REDD-plus政策框架,而应通过检查该领域的实际情况进行评估以帮助进行建设性的讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号