首页> 外文期刊>British journal of nursing: BJN >Pumps, feed and sets: Is procurement limiting outcomes?
【24h】

Pumps, feed and sets: Is procurement limiting outcomes?

机译:泵,饲料和机组:采购是否限制成果?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This article aims to review the unique ways in which enteral feed, ancillary items and pumps are procured in the UK and to evaluate whether these are inhibiting innovation and reducing the choices of patients. There are a number of models that have been developed across the UK for the procurement of enteral feed, feeding accessories and pump. The two most common are the hospital-based nutrition support team, which may have an overarching role in the community, and the home enteral nutrition (HEN) team, a multidisciplinary community-based team with skilled health professionals dedicated to the delivery of the enteral nutrition service. While the HEN service has its advantages over other models in the community, it is primarily driven by its clinical role. The lack of significant opportunity for clinical audits and research within the service limits the prospects for service improvement, innovation and patients' choices
机译:本文旨在探讨在英国购买肠内饲料,辅助物品和泵的独特方式,并评估它们是否抑制了创新并减少了患者的选择。在英国各地,已经开发出许多型号用于购买肠内饲料,饲料配件和泵的模型。最常见的两个是基于医院的营养支持团队,该团队可能在社区中扮演着主要角色;而家庭肠内营养(HEN)团队,这是一个多学科的,基于社区的团队,其技术熟练的卫生专业人员致力于肠内营养的提供营养服务。尽管HEN服务相对于社区中的其他模型具有优势,但主要是由其临床作用所驱动。服务范围内缺乏大量进行临床审核和研究的机会,这限制了服务改进,创新和患者选择的前景

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号