...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society >Evaluation of the skill and added value of a reanalysis-driven regional simulation for Alpine temperature
【24h】

Evaluation of the skill and added value of a reanalysis-driven regional simulation for Alpine temperature

机译:重新分析驱动的高山温度区域模拟的技能和附加值评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To determine whether the use of regional climate models improves the representation of climate is a crucial topic in climate modelling. An improvement over coarser scale models is expected especially in areas with complex orography or along coastlines. However, some studies have shown no clear added value for regional climate models. In this study a high-resolution regional climate simulation performed with REMO 5.0 (regional model) over the whole of Europe over the period 1958-1998 is analysed for 2-m temperature over the European Alps and their surroundings called the Greater Alpine region (GAR). The simulation is driven by perfect boundary conditions at the lateral boundaries provided by the ERA40 reanalysis and spectral nudging of the large-scale wind fields towards ERA40 values for the upper layers inside the model domain. The added value of the regional simulation (1/6 degrees resolution) is analysed with respect to the driving reanalysis (1.125 degrees resolution). Both the REMO simulation and the ERA40 reanalysis are validated against different station datasets of monthly and daily mean 2-m temperature. Correlation analysis shows that the temporal variability of temperature is well represented by both REMO and ERA40. whereas both show considerable biases. The REMO bias reaches 3 K in summer in regions known to experience a problem with summer drying in a number of regional models. The comparison of REMO and ERA40 shows that an added value of the former exists for all regions in winter. For the regions surrounding the Alps, the added value is absent in summer, whereas in the inner Alpine subregions with most complex orography, REMO performs better than ERA40 during the whole year. The only moderate value added by REMO in this hindcast set-up may be partly explicable by the fact that meteorological measurements are assimilated in the ERA40 reanalysis but not in the REMO simulation. Copyright (C) 2009 Royal Meteorological Society
机译:确定使用区域气候模型是否可以改善气候的表示形式是气候建模中的关键主题。尤其是在地形复杂的地区或沿海岸线的地区,有望对粗尺度模型进行改进。但是,一些研究表明,区域气候模型没有明显的附加值。在这项研究中,使用REMO 5.0(区域模型)对整个欧洲在1958-1998年期间进行的高分辨率区域气候模拟,分析了欧洲阿尔卑斯山及其周围称为大高山地区(GAR)的2 m温度)。模拟是由ERA40重新分析提供的横向边界处的完美边界条件以及模型域内上层的大风场向ERA40值的光谱微调所驱动的。针对驾驶重新分析(1.125度分辨率)分析了区域模拟(1/6度分辨率)的附加值。 REMO模拟和ERA40再分析均针对月平均日均2 m温度的不同站点数据集进行了验证。相关分析表明,REMO和ERA40都很好地代表了温度的时变性。而两者都显示出很大的偏见。在许多区域模型中,REMO偏差在已知达到夏季干燥问题的地区在夏季达到3K。 REMO和ERA40的比较表明,冬季所有地区都存在前者的附加值。对于阿尔卑斯山周边地区,夏季缺少附加值,而在地形最复杂的阿尔卑斯山内分区,REMO全年的表现要优于ERA40。在此后播设置中,REMO唯一增加的适中值可能是由于ERA40再分析中吸收了气象测量结果而在REMO模拟中没有吸收气象数据这一事实。皇家气象学会(C)2009

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号