...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society >Simulation of 2006 monsoon using T170L42 AGCM: sensitivity to convective parameterization schemes
【24h】

Simulation of 2006 monsoon using T170L42 AGCM: sensitivity to convective parameterization schemes

机译:使用T170L42 AGCM模拟2006年季风:对流参数化方案的敏感性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this study we used the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) T170L42 Global Forecast System model for simulating the monsoon of 2006 using two different cumulus parameterization schemes viz. the Simple Arakawa-Schubert (SAS) scheme and the Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert (RAS) scheme. The NCEP Coupled Forecast System (CFS) monthly forecast sea surface temperatures (SST) were used for simulating the monsoon season. It is seen that both the schemes forecast the mean seasonal rainfall close to the observed. However. there were differences in the spatial and temporal distribution of the rainfall. The spatial distribution of the precipitation simulated by the RAS scheme was comparable to the observed. The SAS scheme simulated realistic distribution of the rainfall in the months of June and July. In the months of August and September. the SAS scheme could not simulate the convective regions over the south and central Bay of Bengal. Arabian Sea and the Indian landmass. The SAS scheme simulated withdrawal-like symptoms of the monsoon in the month of August itself. However, the same SAS scheme simulated more realistic rainfall distribution over the Bay of Bengal when the model was run with climatological SST and also when the model was run at a resolution of T62 and with CFS-forecast SST. The onset of the monsoon over the Kerala coast of India simulated with both the schemes was within one pentad of the observed date of onset. Copyright (c) 2008 Royal Meteorological Society
机译:在这项研究中,我们使用美国国家环境预测中心(NCEP)T170L42全球预报系统模型,使用两种不同的累积参数化方案来模拟2006年的季风。简单的Arakawa-Schubert(SAS)方案和宽松的Arakawa-Schubert(RAS)方案。 NCEP耦合预报系统(CFS)的每月预报海表温度(SST)用于模拟季风季节。可以看出,这两个方案都预测了接近观测值的平均季节性降雨。然而。降雨的时空分布存在差异。通过RAS方案模拟的降水的空间分布与观察到的相当。 SAS方案模拟了6月和7月的实际降雨分布。在八月和九月。 SAS方案无法模拟孟加拉南部和中部湾的对流区域。阿拉伯海和印度大陆。 SAS方案模拟了8月本身的季风抽回状症状。但是,当该模型使用气候SST运行时,以及该模型以T62分辨率和CFS预测SST运行时,相同的SAS方案也模拟了孟加拉湾上更实际的降雨分布。用这两种方案模拟的印度喀拉拉海岸上的季风爆发都在观测到的爆发日期的一个五分之内。版权所有(c)2008皇家气象学会

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号