...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society >Comparison of elevation and remote sensing derived products as auxiliary data for climate surface interpolation
【24h】

Comparison of elevation and remote sensing derived products as auxiliary data for climate surface interpolation

机译:比较海拔和遥感衍生产品作为气候面插值的辅助数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Climate models may be limited in their inferential use if they cannot be locally validated or do not account for spatial uncertainty. Much of the focus has gone into determining which interpolation method is best suited for creating gridded climate surfaces, which often a covariate such as elevation (Digital Elevation Model, DEM) is used to improve the interpolation accuracy. One key area where little research has addressed is in determining which covariate best improves the accuracy in the interpolation. In this study, a comprehensive evaluation was carried out in determining which covariates were most suitable for interpolating climatic variables (e.g. precipitation, mean temperature, minimum temperature, and maximum temperature). We compiled data for each climate variable from 1950 to 1999 from approximately 500 weather stations across the Western United States (32? to 49? latitude and ?124.7? to ?112.9? longitude). In addition, we examined the uncertainty of the interpolated climate surface. Specifically, Thin Plate Spline (TPS) was used as the interpolation method since it is one of the most popular interpolation techniques to generate climate surfaces. We considered several covariates, including DEM, slope, distance to coast (Euclidean distance), aspect, solar potential, radar, and two Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) products derived from Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). A tenfold cross-validation was applied to determine the uncertainty of the interpolation based on each covariate. In general, the leading covariate for precipitation was radar, while DEM was the leading covariate for maximum, mean, and minimum temperatures. A comparison to other products such as PRISM and WorldClim showed strong agreement across large geographic areas but climate surfaces generated in this study (ClimSurf) had greater variability at high elevation regions, such as in the Sierra Nevada Mountains.
机译:如果无法局部验证气候模型或不考虑空间不确定性,则气候模型的推论用途可能会受到限制。很多焦点都集中在确定哪种插值方法最适合于创建网格化的气候表面,通常使用协变量(例如海拔高度)(数字高程模型,DEM)来提高插值精度。研究很少涉及的一个关键领域是确定哪个协变量最能提高插值的准确性。在这项研究中,我们进行了综合评估,以确定哪些协变量最适合插值气候变量(例如降水,平均温度,最低温度和最高温度)。我们针对1950年至1999年每个气候变量收集了来自美国西部约500个气象站(纬度32至49度,经度124.7至112.9度)的数据。此外,我们检查了内插气候面的不确定性。具体来说,薄板样条线(TPS)被用作内插方法,因为它是生成气候表面的最流行的内插技术之一。我们考虑了多个协变量,包括DEM,坡度,到海岸的距离(欧几里得距离),坡向,太阳势,雷达,以及两个源自高级超高分辨率辐射计(AVHRR)和中等分辨率成像光谱仪的归一化植被指数(NDVI)产品(MODIS)。应用十倍交叉验证,根据每个协变量确定插值的不确定性。通常,降水的主要协变量是雷达,而DEM是最高,平均和最低温度的主要协变量。与其他产品(例如PRISM和WorldClim)的比较显示,在较大的地理区域内有很强的一致性,但本研究(ClimSurf)产生的气候表面在高海拔地区(例如内华达山脉)的变异性更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号