...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of computational fluid dynamics >Finite element computation of turbulent flow past a multi-element airfoil
【24h】

Finite element computation of turbulent flow past a multi-element airfoil

机译:流经多元素翼型的有限元计算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Flow past multi-element airfoil is studied via two-dimensional numerical simulations. The incompressible Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations, in primitive variables, are solved using a stabilized finite element formulation. The Spalart-Allmaras and Baldwin-Lomax models are employed for turbulence closure. The implementation of the Spalart-Allmaras model is verified by computing flow over a flat plate with a specified trip location. Good agreement is seen between the results obtained with the two models for flow past a NACA 0012 airfoil at 5 degrees angle of attack. Results for the multi-element airfoil, with the two turbulence models, are compared with experiments for various angles of attack. In general, the pressure distribution, from both the models matches quite well with the experimental results. However, at larger angles of attack, the computational results overpredict the suction peak on the slat. The velocity profiles from the Baldwin-Lomax model are, in general, more diffused compared to those from the Spalart-Allmaras model. The agreement between the computed and experimental results is not too good in the flap region for large angles of attack. Both the models are unable to predict the stall; the flow remains attached even for relatively large angles of attack. Consequently, the lift coefficient is over predicted at large a by the computations. Overall, compared to the Baldwin-Lomax model, the predictions from the Spalart-Allmaras model are closer to experimental measurements.
机译:通过二维数值模拟研究了流经多元素机翼的流动。使用稳定的有限元公式求解原始变量中不可压缩的雷诺平均Navier-Stokes方程。 Spalart-Allmaras和Baldwin-Lomax模型用于湍流封闭。通过计算具有指定行程位置的平板上的流量来验证Spalart-Allmaras模型的实现。两种模型在以5度迎角流过NACA 0012翼型时获得的结果之间达成了很好的一致性。将具有两种湍流模型的多元素机翼的结果与各种迎角的实验进行了比较。通常,两个模型的压力分布与实验结果非常吻合。但是,在较大的迎角下,计算结果会过度预测板条上的吸力峰。与Spalart-Allmaras模型的速度分布相比,Baldwin-Lomax模型的速度分布通常更分散。对于大迎角而言,在襟翼区域中,计算结果与实验结果之间的一致性不太好。两种模型都无法预测失速。即使相对较大的迎角,流量仍保持附着。因此,通过计算,升力系数在很大程度上被过度预测。总体而言,与Baldwin-Lomax模型相比,Spalart-Allmaras模型的预测更接近于实验测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号