首页> 外文期刊>British journal of ophthalmology >Cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab in treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME) causing visual impairment: Evidence from the RESTORE trial
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab in treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME) causing visual impairment: Evidence from the RESTORE trial

机译:雷珠单抗治疗引起视力障碍的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的成本效益:RESTORE试验的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background/aims: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab as either monotherapy or combined with laser therapy, compared with laser monotherapy, in the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME) causing visual impairment from a UK healthcare payer perspective. Methods: A Markov model simulated long-term outcomes and costs of treating DME in one eye (BCVA ≤75 letters) based on data from the RESTORE Phase III trial. Outcomes measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were simulated for a 15-year time horizon based on 12-month follow-up from RESTORE and published long-term data. Costs included treatment, disease monitoring, visual impairment and blindness (at 2010 price levels). Results: Ranibizumab monotherapy resulted in a 0.17 QALY gain at an incremental cost of £4191 relative to laser monotherapy, yielding an incremental costeffectiveness ratio (ICER) of £24 028. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a 64% probability of being cost-effective at a threshold of £30 000 per QALY. Combined ranibizumab and laser therapy resulted in a 0.13 QALY gain at an incremental cost of £4695 relative to laser monotherapy (ICER £36 106; 42% probability of ICER <£30 000). Conclusions: Based on RESTORE 1-year follow-up data, ranibizumab monotherapy appears to be cost-effective relative to laser monotherapy, the current standard of care. Cost-effectiveness of combination therapy is less certain. Ongoing studies will further inform on disease progression and the need for additional ranibizumab treatment.
机译:背景/目的:从英国医疗付款人的角度,评估雷珠单抗单药治疗或激光治疗与激光单药治疗相比在治疗引起视力障碍的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)中的成本效益。方法:基于来自RESTORE III期试验的数据,Markov模型模拟了一只眼睛(BCVA≤75个字母)的DME的长期治疗效果和费用。基于RESTORE的12个月随访并发布了长期数据,对15年时间范围内以质量调整生命年(QALYs)衡量的结果进行了模拟。费用包括治疗,疾病监测,视力障碍和失明(按2010年价格水平)。结果:雷珠单抗单药治疗相对于激光单药治疗增加了0.17 QALY,费用为£ 4191,增加了成本效益比(ICER)为)24028。概率敏感性分析表明,在接受激光治疗后,成本效益比为64%每个QALY £ 30000的门槛。雷尼珠单抗和激光治疗相结合,相对于激光单药治疗,增加了0.13 QALY,而费用却增加了4695英镑(ICER £ 36 106; ICER <£ 30000的概率为42%)。结论:根据RESTORE的1年随访数据,兰尼单抗单药治疗相对于目前的标准激光单药治疗具有成本效益。联合治疗的成本效益尚不确定。正在进行的研究将进一步告知疾病进展以及其他兰尼单抗治疗的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号