...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical practice >Assessment of the quality of care and financial impact of a virtual renal clinic compared with the traditional outpatient service model.
【24h】

Assessment of the quality of care and financial impact of a virtual renal clinic compared with the traditional outpatient service model.

机译:与传统的门诊服务模型相比,评估虚拟肾脏诊所的护理质量和财务影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have better outcomes when they have access to specialist nephrology services early in the course of their disease. However, up to 30% of patients with advanced kidney disease face late referral. Virtual clinics represent a potentially innovative mechanism for early assessment of high patient volumes efficiently and cost effectively while maintaining high standards of care. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was completed over a 4-year period from April 2004 to March 2008 at a regional nephrology centre within Northern Ireland. All new patient attendances at the nephrology clinic were identified and those managed via the virtual renal clinic approach were included in this study. A cost comparison of this innovative modality was made with the traditional outpatient service model. RESULTS: There were 427 patients (51.3% female, 48.7% male) managed through the virtual renal clinic. Comorbidities included 180 patients (42.1%) with known CKD and 31 patients (7.3%) with newly identified kidney disease. A total of 118 patients (27.6%) had hypertension while 6 (1.4%) and 57 (13.3%) had type I and II diabetes mellitus (DM) respectively. Referral indications included 211 patients (49.4%) with abnormal renal biochemistry, 35 (8.2%) with proteinuria, 12 (2.8%) with haematuria and 87 patients (20.4%) with a combination of issues. A conservative treatment plan consisting of biochemical surveillance was appropriate for 246 patients (57.6%) while medication review was completed for 113 patients (26.5%) and surgical referral was indicated in 20 patients (4.7%). The virtual renal clinic provided a minimum cost saving of pound111.56 per patient attendance compared with traditional outpatient care resulting in 23.3% of patient referrals being managed by the virtual clinic approach in 2009. CONCLUSION: Delayed referral to a renal specialist adversely affects patient outcomes. This study suggests that the implementation of a virtual renal clinic for non-complex renal pathologies can offer a cost-effective, rapid referral mechanism for patient assessment combined with readily available specialist advice.
机译:背景:患有慢性肾脏病(CKD)的患者在病程早期获得专科肾脏病服务时会获得更好的结果。但是,多达30%的晚期肾脏疾病患者面临转诊延迟。虚拟诊所代表着一种潜在的创新机制,可以在保持高标准护理水平的同时,以高成本效益的方式及早评估大量患者。方法:一项回顾性观察性队列研究于2004年4月至2008年3月的4年期间在北爱尔兰的一个区域肾脏病学中心完成。确定了肾脏科门诊的所有新患者出诊,通过虚拟肾脏门诊处理的入院患者也包括在本研究中。这种创新方式的成本与传统的门诊服务模式进行了比较。结果:通过虚拟肾脏诊所治疗的427例患者中,女性为51.3%,男性为48.7%。合并症包括180位已知CKD的患者(42.1%)和31位新发现的肾脏疾病的患者(7.3%)。共有118例患者(27.6%)患有高血压,而I型和II型糖尿病(DM)分别为6例(1.4%)和57例(13.3%)。转诊指征包括211例(49.4%)肾生化异常的患者,35例(8.2%)的蛋白尿,12例(2.8%)的血尿和87例合并问题的患者。 246例患者(57.6%)适合采用保守的包括生化监测的治疗方案,而113例患者(26.5%)的用药审查已经完成,而20例患者(4.7%)则需要手术转诊。与传统的门诊服务相比,虚拟肾脏诊所每位患者就诊的最低成本节省为111.56英镑,从而在2009年通过虚拟诊所方法管理了23.3%的患者转诊。结论:延迟转诊至肾脏专科医师会对患者预后产生不利影响。这项研究表明,针对非复杂性肾脏病变的虚拟肾脏诊所的实施可以为患者评估提供成本有效,快速的转诊机制,并结合现成的专家意见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号