首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical practice >Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of low-dose perindopril/indapamide combination compared with losartan in the treatment of essential hypertension.
【24h】

Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of low-dose perindopril/indapamide combination compared with losartan in the treatment of essential hypertension.

机译:与氯沙坦相比,小剂量培哚普利/吲达帕胺联合抗高血压药的疗效和耐受性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aim of the study was to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the low-dose combination of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril 2 mg plus the diuretic indapamide 0.625 mg (P/I) compared with the angiotensin II antagonist losartan 50 mg (L50) in the treatment of essential hypertension. Patients (n = 277) were randomised, double-blind and allocated to receive either P/I or L50 once daily for a period of 12 weeks. Responder and normalisation rates in the two groups were compared by a chi 2 test. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring results were compared using the one-tailed Student's t-test. Normalisation rates were significantly greater in the P/I group (76.0%) than in the L50 group (60.0%) (p = 0.009). Responder rates were significantly higher in the P/I group (91.7%) than in the L50 group (81.8%) (p = 0.025). The average blood pressure reductions were: in sSBP (P/I-L50 = -2.4 mmHg; CI: 6.2; 1.3) and sDBP (P/I-L50 = -2.0 mmHg; CI: -4.2; 0.2). The average night-time SBP decrease (ABPM) was significantly greater in the P/I group (p = 0.041). The tolerability was comparable between the two groups in terms of emergent adverse events related to treatment (12.4% for P/I patients and 8.4% for L50 patients). Laboratory evaluations did not show any significant variations. It was concluded the low-dose P/I combination had significantly higher responder and normalisation rates than L50. This study also confirmed the good tolerability of both treatments.
机译:该研究的目的是评估血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂培哚普利2 mg加利尿吲达帕酰胺0.625 mg(P / I)与血管紧张素II拮抗剂洛沙坦50 mg(低剂量)的低剂量联合用药的抗高血压功效和耐受性L50)治疗原发性高血压。患者(n = 277)被随机,双盲并分配为接受P / I或L50每天一次,持续12周。通过χ2检验比较两组的应答者和标准化率。使用单尾学生t检验比较动态血压监测结果。 P / I组的标准化率(76.0%)明显高于L50组的标准化率(60.0%)(p = 0.009)。 P / I组(91.7%)的应答率显着高于L50组(81.8%)(p = 0.025)。平均血压降低为:sSBP(P / I-L50 = -2.4 mmHg; CI:6.2; 1.3)和sDBP(P / I-L50 = -2.0 mmHg; CI:-4.2; 0.2)。 P / I组的夜间平均SBP下降(ABPM)明显更大(p = 0.041)。就与治疗有关的紧急不良事件而言,两组之间的耐受性相当(P / I患者为12.4%,L50患者为8.4%)。实验室评估未显示任何重大变化。可以得出结论,低剂量P / I组合比L50具有更高的响应率和归一化率。这项研究还证实了两种治疗方法的良好耐受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号