首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical pharmacy. >Cost-utility analysis of a pharmacy-led self-management programme for patients with COPD.
【24h】

Cost-utility analysis of a pharmacy-led self-management programme for patients with COPD.

机译:药房主导的COPD患者自我管理计划的成本效用分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To undertake a cost-utility analysis (CUA) of a pharmacy-led self-management programme for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). SETTING: A single outpatient COPD clinic at the Mater Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland between. METHOD: CUA alongside a randomised control trial. The economic analysis used data from 127 COPD patients aged over 45 years, with an FEV1 of 30-80% of the predicted normal value. Participants received either a pharmacy-led education and self-management programme, or usual care. One year costs were estimated from the perspective of the National Health Service and Personal Social Services and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated based on responses to the EQ-5D at baseline, 6 and 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cost per QALY gained. RESULTS: The mean differences in costs and effects between the self-management and education programme and usual care were - pound671.59 (95 CI%: - pound1,584.73 to - pound68.14) and 0.065 (95% CI; 0.000-0.128). Thus the intervention was the dominant strategy as it was both less costly and more effective than usual care. The probability of the intervention being cost-effective was 95% at a threshold of pound20,000/QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses indicated that conclusions were robust to variations in most of the key parameters. CONCLUSION: The self-management and education programme was found to be highly cost-effective compared to usual care. Further research is required to establish what aspects of self-management and education programmes have the greatest impact on cost-effectiveness.
机译:目的:对以药物为主导的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)自我管理计划进行成本-效用分析(CUA)。地点:位于北爱尔兰贝尔法斯特市Mater医院之间的单一门诊COPD诊所。方法:CUA和随机对照试验。经济分析使用了127名45岁以上COPD患者的数据,FEV1为预测正常值的30-80%。参与者接受了以药房为主导的教育和自我管理计划,或者接受了常规护理。从国家卫生服务和个人社会服务的角度估计了一年的成本,并根据对基线,6个月和12个月对EQ-5D的反应计算了质量调整生命年(QALYs)。主要观察指标:获得的每QALY成本。结果:自我管理和教育计划与常规护理之间的成本和效果的平均差异为-£671.59(95 CI%:-1,584.73至-68.14英镑)和0.065(95%CI; 0.000-0.128) )。因此,干预是占主导地位的策略,因为与常规护理相比,该方法成本更低,更有效。在获得20,000英镑/ QALY阈值的情况下,干预具有成本效益的可能性为95%。敏感性分析表明,结论对于大多数关键参数的变化都是可靠的。结论:与常规护理相比,自我管理和教育计划具有很高的成本效益。需要进行进一步的研究以确定自我管理和教育计划的哪些方面对成本效益影响最大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号