...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Research >Crossover clinical study comparing the pharmacokinetics of etoposide (75 mg) administered as 25-mg capsules three times a day versus once a day.
【24h】

Crossover clinical study comparing the pharmacokinetics of etoposide (75 mg) administered as 25-mg capsules three times a day versus once a day.

机译:交叉临床研究比较了依托泊苷(75毫克)以25毫克胶囊的形式每天服用3次与每天一次相比的药代动力学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Some investigators have postulated that a constant low blood level might be the ideal mode of treatment, while others have seen no reason to divide up the daily dose. To our knowledge, this study is the first to include crossover of subjects to eradicate individual differences. Our aim was to compare the pharmacokinetic effects of administering etoposide three times a day vs. once a day as 25 mg capsules. Two groups of four patients each received 75 mg/day oral etoposide for 2 days either as 75 mg once daily, or as 25 mg three times daily for 2 days. On days 8 and 9, the treatments were switched between groups. On the one-dose schedule, Cpeek (peak plasma concentration) was greater than 2 micrograms/ml in five patients and greater than 3 micrograms/ml in three patients, while in none of the patients on the three-dose schedule did the peak exceed 2 micrograms/ml. No significant difference was found in terms of Cmean (calculated by dividing the area under the curve by the observed time) between the two treatments. Variability of blood concentrations of etoposide over a 24 h period was high on the one-dose schedule (median 95%, range 54-148%) but it was lower on the three-dose schedule (median 39%, range 28%-55%). No significant differences were found between the two different dosing schedules in terms of the median duration of etoposide blood levels above 0.5 microgram/ml and above 1.0 microgram/ml. These results suggest that detailed clinical toxicity and efficacy data are needed to clarify the possible benefits of the fractionated administration of oral etoposide.
机译:一些研究者推测恒定的低血脂水平可能是理想的治疗方式,而另一些研究者则认为没有理由将每日剂量分开。据我们所知,这项研究是首次涵盖交叉研究以消除个体差异的研究。我们的目的是比较每天服用三次依托泊苷与每天一次服用25毫克胶囊的依托泊苷的药代动力学效果。两组,每组四名患者,每人每天接受75毫克/天的口服依托泊苷,为期2天,每天一次为75毫克,或每天两次为25毫克,持续2天。在第8天和第9天,在各组之间切换治疗。在单剂量方案中,五名患者的Cpeek(峰值血浆浓度)大于2微克/毫升,三名患者中大于3微克/毫升,而在三剂量方案中没有一个患者的峰值超过2毫克/毫升。两种处理之间的均值(以曲线下面积除以观察到的时间计算)均无显着差异。依托泊苷的血药浓度在24小时内的变化在单剂量方案中较高(中位数为95%,范围为54-148%),但在三剂量方案中较低(中位数为39%,范围为28%-55) %)。依托泊苷血液水平的中位持续时间高于0.5微克/毫升和高于1.0微克/毫升,在两种不同的给药方案之间未发现显着差异。这些结果表明需要详细的临床毒性和功效数据来阐明口服依托泊苷的可能的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号