首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Research >Effect of inhaled combination therapy on asthma management.
【24h】

Effect of inhaled combination therapy on asthma management.

机译:吸入联合疗法对哮喘治疗的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The growing use of guidelines to manage asthmatic patients prompted us to evaluate their impact on clinical practice. This study was performed in two similar groups of asthmatic patients. A retrospective and prospective review of medical records in an asthmatic population was performed. The patients were followed up for a mean period of 2 years before (group 1 [G1]) and after the publication of the Guideline for Asthma Treatment (group 2 [G2]). After evaluation of objective/clinical measurements we noticed a significant difference between both groups. There were 23 and 40 patients who did not complain of any respiratory symptoms in G1 and G2, respectively. The total number of visits to the emergency department decreased by more than 75%, from 26 (G1) to six (G2). The forced expiratory volume in 1 sec improved by a mean of 4% in G1 and 9% in G2. After application of the guidelines there was a redistribution of the degree of disease severity. In G2, there was a 12% increase in the use of long-acting beta2-stimulating sprays; 40% of the patients were using a combination of a long-acting beta2-stimulating drug and an inhaled steroid. In our experience, the use of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines leads to better management of asthma patients with different degrees of severity. These findings suggest the need to perform a similar analysis in a broader setting such as a national multicenter survey in order to collect information on the challenges of putting these theoretical difficulties into practice and to compare their implementation in distinct centers.
机译:指南越来越多地用于管理哮喘患者,这促使我们评估其对临床实践的影响。这项研究在两组相似的哮喘患者中进行。对哮喘人群的病历进行回顾性和前瞻性审查。在患者治疗之前(组1 [G1])和出版《哮喘治疗指南》(组2 [G2])之后,平均随访2年。在评估客观/临床测量结果后,我们注意到两组之间存在显着差异。 G1和G2分别没有23例和40例没有任何呼吸道症状的患者。急诊就诊总数减少了75%以上,从26(G1)减少到6(G2)。 1秒内的强制呼气量在G1中平均提高了4%,在G2中提高了9%。应用指南后,疾病严重程度得到了重新分配。在G2中,长效β2刺激性喷雾剂的使用增加了12%; 40%的患者使用长效β2刺激药和吸入类固醇的组合。根据我们的经验,使用全球哮喘倡议(GINA)指南可以更好地管理不同严重程度的哮喘患者。这些发现表明,有必要在更广泛的环境下进行类似的分析,例如在国家多中心调查中,以收集有关将这些理论困难付诸实践的挑战的信息,并比较在不同中心的实施情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号