首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical pharmacy. >Current perceptions of the term Clinical Pharmacy and its relationship to Pharmaceutical Care: a survey of members of the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy
【24h】

Current perceptions of the term Clinical Pharmacy and its relationship to Pharmaceutical Care: a survey of members of the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy

机译:对临床药学一词及其与药物护理的关系的最新认识:对欧洲临床药学协会成员的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background The definitions that are being used for the terms 'clinical pharmacy' and 'pharmaceutical care' seem to have a certain overlap. Responsibility for therapy outcomes seems to be especially linked to the latter term. Both terms need clarification before a proper definition of clinical pharmacy can be drafted. Objective To identify current disagreements regarding the term 'Clinical Pharmacy' and its relationship to 'Pharmaceutical Care' and to assess to which extent pharmacists with an interest in Clinical Pharmacy are willing to accept responsibility for drug therapy outcomes. Setting The membership of the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy. Methods A total of 1,285 individuals affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy were invited by email to participate in an online survey asking participants to state whether certain professional activities, providers, settings, aims and general descriptors constituted (a) 'Clinical Pharmacy only', (b) 'Pharmaceutical Care only', (c) 'both' or (d) 'neither'. Further questions examined pharmacists' willingness to accept ethical or legal responsibility for drug therapy outcomes, under current and ideal working conditions. Main outcome measures Level of agreement with a number of statements. Results There was disagreement (< 80% agreement among all participants) regarding 'Clinical Pharmacy' activities, whether non-pharmacists could provide 'Clinical Pharmacy' services, and whether such services could be provided in non-hospital settings. There was disagreement (< 80% agreement among those linking items to Clinical Pharmacy) as to whether Pharmaceutical care also encompassed certain professional activities, constituted a scientific discipline and targeted cost effectiveness. The proportions of participants willing to accept legal responsibility under current/ideal working conditions were: safety (32.7%/64.3%), effectiveness (17.9%/49.2%), patient-centeredness (17.1%/46.2%), cost-effectiveness (20.3%/44.0%). Conclusions The survey identified key disagreements around the term 'Clinical Pharmacy' and its relationship to 'Pharmaceutical Care', which future discussions around a harmonised definition of 'Clinical Pharmacy' should aim to resolve. Further research is required to understand barriers and facilitators to pharmacists accepting responsibility for drug therapy outcomes.
机译:背景技术用于“临床药学”和“药物治疗”的定义似乎有一定的重叠。治疗结果的责任似乎与后一个术语特别相关。在起草临床药理学的正确定义之前,需要对这两个术语进行澄清。目的确定当前关于“临床药学”一词及其与“药物护理”之间关系的分歧,并评估对临床药学感兴趣的药剂师愿意在多大程度上接受药物治疗结果的责任。设置欧洲临床药学学会会员。方法通过电子邮件邀请总共1,285名隶属于欧洲临床药学协会的人员参加在线调查,要求参与者陈述某些专业活动,提供者,设置,目的和一般描述符是否构成(a)“仅临床药学” ,(b)“仅限药品护理”,(c)“均为”或“ d”均为“都不”。进一步的问题审查了药剂师在当前和理想的工作条件下是否愿意对药物治疗结果承担道德或法律责任。主要结果衡量标准与许多陈述的一致程度。结果对于“临床药房”活动,非药剂师是否可以提供“临床药房”服务以及是否可以在非医院环境中提供此类服务,存在争议(所有参与者之间的同意率均低于80%)。关于药物护理是否还包括某些专业活动,是否构成科学学科和有针对性的成本效益,存在分歧(在与临床药学有关的项目中,达成共识的少于80%)。在当前/理想的工作条件下愿意承担法律责任的参与者比例为:安全(32.7%/ 64.3%),有效性(17.9%/ 49.2%),以患者为中心(17.1%/ 46.2%),成本效益( 20.3%/ 44.0%)。结论该调查确定了围绕“临床药学”一词的主要分歧及其与“药学护理”的关系,未来围绕“临床药学”统一定义的讨论应旨在解决这些分歧。需要进一步的研究来理解阻碍药物治疗结果负责的药剂师的障碍和促进者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号