首页> 外文期刊>International clinical psychopharmacology >Lack of efficacy of moclobemide or imipramine in the treatment of recurrent brief depression: results from an exploratory randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment study
【24h】

Lack of efficacy of moclobemide or imipramine in the treatment of recurrent brief depression: results from an exploratory randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment study

机译:莫氯贝胺或丙咪嗪在复发性短暂性抑郁症治疗中缺乏疗效:一项探索性随机,双盲,安慰剂对照治疗研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recurrent brief depression' (RBD) is a common, distressing and impairing depressive disorder for which there is no current proven pharmacological or psychological treatment. This multicentre, randomized, fixed-dose, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study of the reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase moclobemide (450 mg/day) and the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine (150 mg/day) evaluated the potential efficacy of active medication, when compared with placebo, in patients with recurrent brief depression, recruited in the mid-1990s. After a 2-4-week single-blind placebo run-in period, a total of 35 patients were randomized to receive double-blind medication for 4 months, but only 16 completed the active treatment period. An intention-to-treat analysis of the 34 evaluable patients found no evidence for the efficacy of moclobemide or imipramine, when compared with placebo, in significantly reducing the severity, duration or frequency of depressive episodes. A total of 28 patients experienced at least one adverse event, and four patients engaged in nonfatal self-harm. Limitations of the study include the small sample size and the high rate of participant withdrawal. The lack of efficacy of these antidepressant drugs and the previous finding of the lack of efficacy of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine together indicate that medications other than antidepressant drugs should be investigated as potential treatments for what remains a common, distressing and potentially hazardous condition. (C) 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health broken vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
机译:反复发作的短暂性抑郁症(RBD)是一种常见的,令人痛苦的和令人沮丧的抑郁症,目前尚无药物或心理治疗方法。这项多中心,随机,固定剂量,平行组,安慰剂对照的研究对单胺氧化酶莫氯贝米(450 mg /天)和三环抗抑郁药丙咪嗪(150 mg /天)的可逆抑制剂进行了评估,评估了活性药物的潜在疗效,与安慰剂相比,在1990年代中期招募的复发性短暂抑郁症患者。经过2到4周的单盲安慰剂磨合期后,共有35例患者被随机分配接受双盲药物治疗4个月,但只有16例完成了积极治疗期。对34位可评估患者进行的意向治疗分析发现,与安慰剂相比,无证据证明莫氯贝米或丙咪嗪能显着降低抑郁发作的严重程度,持续时间或频率。共有28位患者经历了至少一项不良事件,四位患者进行了非致命性自我伤害。该研究的局限性包括样本量小和参与者退出率高。这些抗抑郁药的功效不足,以及选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂氟西汀的缺乏功效的先前发现共同表明,应研究除抗抑郁药以外的其他药物,以治疗仍然常见,令人困扰和潜在危险的疾病。 (C)2014 Wolters Kluwer Health垂直竖条Lippincott Williams&Wilkins。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号