首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives >Effect of different mechanical cleansing protocols of dentin for recementation procedures on micro-shear bond strength of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements
【24h】

Effect of different mechanical cleansing protocols of dentin for recementation procedures on micro-shear bond strength of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements

机译:牙本质修复方法的不同机械清洁方案对常规和自粘树脂水泥的微剪切粘结强度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Service life of debonded indirect dental restorations could be prolonged by recementation. This process requires removal of cement remnants from dentin. This study evaluated the effect of different mechanical cleansing protocols of dentin for recementation procedures on micro-shear bond strength (pSBS) of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements. The labial surfaces mandibular incisors (N=200) were ground with a low speed saw to expose the coronal dentin. The teeth were randomly divided into two subgroups (n: 100 per group) and received either (a) conventional (Panavia F 2.0, Kuraray, PAN) or (b) self-adhesive (Clearfil SA, Kuraray, CSA) resin cement. Resin cements were condensed into polyethylene molds incrementally and photo polymerized using an LED polymerization unit. Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 C for 24 h and subjected to U.SBS (0.5 mm/min). Resin cement remnants on bonded dentin surfaces were removed using by (a) composite finishing bur (cb), (b) tungsten carbide bur (ob), (c) ultrasonic scaler tip (sc) or (d) pumice-water slurry (pw). Non-cleaned teeth acted as the control group (cn) (n: 20 per subgroup). After cleaning, the same cement type was rebonded simulating clinical recementation. Failure types were analyzed using optical microscope and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Data (MPa) were analyzed using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks, Mann-Whitney U and Bonferroni tests (α = 0.05). Overall, CSA (6.42 + 2.96) showed significantly lower results than that of PAN cement (7.88 ± 3.49} (p < 0.05). All cleansing protocols (4.29 ±2.17 to 5.82 ±2.5) showed significantly lower results than that of the control group (9.84 + 4.88) for PAN cement. For CSA cement, all cleansing protocols presented non-significant results (4.25 + 2.74 to 6.44 ±2.4 MPa) compared to control group (p > 0.05) expect cb method (3.42 + 1.47) (p < 0.05). Remnants of cements were detected on dentin surfaces in all groups at varying degrees. SEM showed that while using pumice-water slurry was the least effective for PAN, tungsten carbide bur was the most effective for both cements. All other methods showed similar cleansing efficacy. None of the cleansing protocols yielded to complete removal of resin cement rest on dentin upon recementation for both cements tested.
机译:脱胶可延长脱粘的间接牙科修复体的使用寿命。该过程需要从牙本质中去除水泥残余物。这项研究评估了牙本质的不同机械清洁方案,对传统的和自粘型树脂水泥的微剪切粘结强度(pSBS)进行胶凝程序。用低速锯研磨下颌切牙的唇表面(N = 200)以暴露冠状牙本质。牙齿被随机分为两个亚组(每组n:100),并接受(a)常规(Panavia F 2.0,Kuraray,PAN)或(b)自粘树脂(Clearfil SA,Kuraray,CSA)。将树脂胶凝剂逐步冷凝到聚乙烯模具中,并使用LED聚合装置进行光聚合。将样品在37°C的蒸馏水中保存24小时,然后进行U.SBS(0.5 mm / min)。使用以下方法去除粘结牙本质表面上的树脂胶渣:(a)复合精加工针(cb),(b)碳化钨针(ob),(c)超声洁牙机尖端(sc)或(d)浮石水浆(pw) )。未清洁的牙齿作为对照组(cn)(n:每个亚组20个)。清洁后,将相同类型的水泥重新粘合以模拟临床愈合。使用光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析故障类型。使用Wilcoxon符号秩,Mann-Whitney U和Bonferroni检验(α= 0.05)分析数据(MPa)。总体而言,CSA(6.42 + 2.96)的结果显着低于PAN水泥(7.88±3.49}(p <0.05),所有清洁方案(4.29±2.17至5.82±2.5)均显着低于对照组。 PAN水泥为(9.84 + 4.88)CSA水泥为所有清洁方案,与对照组(p> 0.05)相比,无显着结果(4.25 + 2.74至6.44±2.4 MPa)(c> 0.05),预期cb方法(3.42 + 1.47)(p <0.05)。在所有组的牙本质表面上都不同程度地检测到水泥的残留物,SEM显示,使用浮石水浆液对PAN的效果最低,而碳化钨bur对两种水泥的效果最佳。对于两种被测试的胶结剂,在胶结后在牙本质上均无法完全除去树脂胶结剂,因此没有一种清洗方案能够完全去除树脂胶结剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号