...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives >Tensile bond strength of PMMA- and composite-based CAD/CAM materials to luting cements after different conditioning methods
【24h】

Tensile bond strength of PMMA- and composite-based CAD/CAM materials to luting cements after different conditioning methods

机译:在不同的调理方法下,PMMA和复合材料CAD / CAM材料对水泥的拉伸粘结强度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigated whether the adhesion of novel generation of polymeric CAD/CAM resins to luting cements would improve after use of different conditioning methods, and to evaluate the failure types after debonding. Two CAD/CAM resins (PMMA- and composite-based) were obtained (N=600, n = 15 per test group). The specimens were conditioned as follows: MH: Monobond Plus/Heliobond, VL: Visio.link, AM: Ambarino P60, VP: VP connect, CG: no conditioning as control group, and luted with conventional (Variolink II) or self-adhesive luting cement (Clearfil SA Cement). Two types of storage were performed: after 24 h water storage (37 °C) and additional 5000 thermal cycles (5 °C/55 °C). Tensile bond strength (TBS) was measured and data were analysed using 4/1-way ANOVA (Scheffe test), independent two-sample t-test and Chi~2 test (alpha=0.05). For both CAD/CAM resins, no or lower bonding was observed for the non-conditioned or AM groups, regardless of the luting cement. The conditioning with MH, VL and VP showed significant increase of TBS. In general, bonding on exp. CAD/CAM composite presented significant higher values compared to PMMA-based artBloc Temp. Variolink II showed higher TBS in combination with artBloc Temp. After conditioning with MH and VL predominantly cohesive failures in the luting cement were observed. All other groups showed adhesive failure. Aging level did not affect the TBS. The bonding properties of the CAD/CAM resin materials are dependent of the targeted selection of the conditioning method and luting cement. Composite-based materials showed higher bonding properties to luting cements than PMMA-based.
机译:这项研究调查了使用不同的调理方法后,新一代的聚合CAD / CAM树脂对胶粘剂的粘附性是否会提高,并评估了脱胶后的破坏类型。获得了两种CAD / CAM树脂(基于PMMA和复合材料)(每个测试组N = 600,n = 15)。样品的处理如下:MH:Monobond Plus / Heliobond,VL:Visio.link,AM:Ambarino P60,VP:VP connect,CG:无条件作为对照组,并使用常规(Variolink II)或自粘胶浸胶(Clearfil SA Cement)。进行了两种类型的存储:24小时的水存储(37°C)和另外的5000个热循环(5°C / 55°C)。测量拉伸粘合强度(TBS),并使用4/1双向方差分析(Scheffe测试),独立的两次样本t检验和Chi〜2检验(alpha = 0.05)分析数据。对于两种CAD / CAM树脂,未观察到任何调理基团或AM基团都没有观察到粘结力或粘结力较低,而与胶粘剂无关。 MH,VL和VP的调理显示TBS显着增加。通常,exp上的键合。与基于PMMA的artBloc Temp相比,CAD / CAM复合材料具有更高的价值。 Variolink II与artBloc Temp结合使用时显示出更高的TBS。用MH和VL调理后,在胶粘剂中主要观察到内聚破坏。所有其他组均显示出粘合失败。老龄化水平并未影响TBS。 CAD / CAM树脂材料的粘结性能取决于修整方法和胶粘剂的目标选择。基于复合材料的材料对胶结水泥的粘合性能高于基于PMMA的材料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号