首页> 外文期刊>International journal of antimicrobial agents >Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous haemofiltration: A randomised controlled trial of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus administration
【24h】

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous haemofiltration: A randomised controlled trial of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus administration

机译:美洛培南在接受连续静脉血液滤过治疗的重症患者中的药代动力学:连续输注与间歇推注给药的随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The objective of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of meropenem, administered by continuous infusion (CI) or intermittent bolus (IB), in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) and to evaluate the frequency of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment with each dosing strategy. This was a prospective, randomised controlled trial in critically ill patients receiving CVVH and administered meropenem by CI or IB. Serial meropenem concentrations in plasma and ultrafiltrate were measured after administration of a standard total daily dose (4 g/day on Day 1, followed by 3 g/day thereafter) on two occasions during antibiotic therapy. Meropenem pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental approach. Sixteen critically ill patients receiving CVVH concurrently treated with meropenem were randomised to CI (n= 8) or IB dosing (n=8). IB administration resulted in higher maximum concentrations (C-max) [64.7 (58.9-80.3) and 64.8 (48.5-81.8) mg/L, respectively] on both sampling occasions compared with CI (p<0.01 and P=0.04, respectively). CI resulted in a higher meropenem steady-state concentration (C-ss) on occasion 1 [26.0 (24.5-41.6) mg/L] compared with the minimum concentration (C-min) observed for IB patients [17.0 (15.7-19.8) mg/L; P<0.01]. CVVH contributed to ca. 50% of meropenem total clearance in these patients. The administered meropenem doses resulted in plasma drug concentrations that were >4x the targeted susceptibility breakpoint (2 mg/L) for 100% of the dosing interval, for both groups, on both occasions. CI could be an alternative to IB for meropenem administration in critically ill patients receiving CVVH. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的目的是描述美洛培南在连续静脉静脉血液滤过(CVVH)的危重患者中通过连续输注(CI)或间歇推注(IB)给药的药代动力学,并评估通过每种加药策略。这是一项针对接受CVVH并通过CI或IB施用美罗培南的重症患者的前瞻性,随机对照试验。在抗生素治疗期间两次给药标准的每日总剂量(第1天每天4 g /天,随后每天3 g /天)后,测量血浆和超滤液中美罗培南的系列浓度。美罗培南的药代动力学参数是使用非房室方法计算的。 16名同时接受美罗培南治疗的CVVH重症患者被随机分配至CI(n = 8)或IB剂量(n = 8)。与CI相比,IB给药在两个采样时均导致更高的最大浓度(C-max)[分别为64.7(58.9-80.3)和64.8(48.5-81.8)mg / L](分别为p <0.01和P = 0.04) 。与在IB患者中观察到的最低浓度(C-min)相比,CI在第1次使用时会导致更高的美罗培南稳态浓度(C-ss)[26.0(24.5-41.6)mg / L] [17.0(15.7-19.8)毫克/升P <0.01]。 CVVH促成了约。这些患者中美洛培南的总清除率为50%。两组在两种情况下,给予美洛培南剂量的血浆药物浓度在给药间隔的100%内均大于目标药敏临界点(2 mg / L)的4倍。对于接受CVVH的重症患者,CI可以替代美罗培南的IB。 (C)2014 Elsevier B.V.和国际化学疗法学会。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号