首页> 外文期刊>International journal of antimicrobial agents >An economic evaluation of a European cohort from a multinational trial of linezolid versus teicoplanin in serious gram-positive bacterial infections: the importance of treatment setting in evaluating treatment effects
【24h】

An economic evaluation of a European cohort from a multinational trial of linezolid versus teicoplanin in serious gram-positive bacterial infections: the importance of treatment setting in evaluating treatment effects

机译:一项利奈唑胺与替考拉宁在严重革兰氏阳性细菌感染中的跨国试验对欧洲队列的经济评价:治疗设置在评估治疗效果中的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a recent multinational trial, hospital resource use and total cost of treatment were compared between linezolid and teicoplanin for severe Gram-positive bacterial infections among 227 European hospitalised patients. The results show that the linezolid group had a 3,2-day (6.3 for linezolid versus 9.5 for teicoplanin groups) shorter mean intravenous antibiotic treatment duration. Certain baseline variables, particularly the inpatient location at enrolment and the presence of outpatient/home parenteral antibiotic therapy (OHPAT), had substantial effects on length of stay (LOS) and cost of treatment. After adjusting for the between-treatment difference in these two variables and other baseline variables, the results showed non-significant shorter LOS and lower mean total cost of treatment for the linezolid group among patients with no access to OHPAT. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
机译:在最近的一项跨国试验中,在227例欧洲住院患者中比较了利奈唑胺和替考拉宁对严重革兰氏阳性细菌感染的医院资源使用和总治疗费用。结果表明,利奈唑胺组的平均静脉抗生素治疗时间缩短了3.2天(利奈唑胺组为6.3天,替考拉宁组为9.5天)。某些基线变量,特别是入院时的住院位置以及门诊/家庭肠胃外抗生素治疗(OHPAT)的存在,对住院时间(LOS)和治疗费用具有重大影响。调整这两个变量和其他基线变量的治疗间差异后,结果显示,在无法获得OHPAT的患者中,利奈唑胺组的LOS无明显缩短,平均总治疗费用较低。 (C)2004年Elsevier B.V.和国际化学疗法学会。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号