首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Applied Engineering Research >Performance Analysis of CEM Techniques for Prediction of RCS of a Complex Shaped Body
【24h】

Performance Analysis of CEM Techniques for Prediction of RCS of a Complex Shaped Body

机译:CEM技术预测复杂形体RCS的性能分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are several challenges in the area of computation and measurement of RCS of large targets, such as, aircrafts, tankers, and ships of modern design. Several computational electromagnetic (CEM) techniques have been developed over the years to compute the RCS of such large targets, and each technique has its own advantages in certain applications. The selection of a suitable technique for RCS calculations may depend on the main objective behind the scattering calculations, the geometry of the target and the frequency of operation. In this paper, the performance of three CEM techniques, namely, the Method of Moments (MoM), Multi Level Fast Multipole Method (MLFMM) and Physical Optics (PO), have been studied and compared. For illustrative purposes, the RCS prediction of a perfectly electrically conducting (PEC) aircraft has been chosen. The performance comparison is done from resonance region to optical region in order to illustrate the range of the applicability, validity, and accuracy of the chosen CEM techniques. Bistatic RCS results are presented for an aircraft, whose electrical size is varied from IX to 233X.
机译:在大型目标(例如飞机,油轮和现代设计的船舶)的RCS的计算和测量领域中存在若干挑战。多年来,已经开发了几种计算电磁(CEM)技术来计算此类大目标的RCS,并且每种技术在某些应用中都有其自身的优势。为RCS计算选择合适的技术可能取决于散射计算背后的主要目的,目标的几何形状和工作频率。本文研究并比较了三种CEM技术的性能,即矩量法(MoM),多级快速多极方法(MLFMM)和物理光学(PO)。为了说明的目的,已经选择了完美导电(PEC)飞机的RCS预测。从谐振区域到光学区域进行性能比较,以说明所选CEM技术的适用范围,有效性和准确性。给出了飞机的双基地RCS结果,其电气尺寸从IX到233X不等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号