...
首页> 外文期刊>International angiology: A journal of the International Union of Angiology >Surgical and endovascular intervention on internal carotid artery near occlusion
【24h】

Surgical and endovascular intervention on internal carotid artery near occlusion

机译:颈内动脉近闭塞的外科手术和血管内干预

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Therapeutic strategy for treating carotid artery near occlusion (CANO) has been controversial. The aim of this study was to review the literature concerning the invasive treatment of atherosclerotic CANO. A review was conducted of the English medical literature from 1980 to 2013 using PubMedand EMBASE database to find studies involving open or endovascular management of CANO. The search identified 20 reports describing invasive treatment of CANO encompassing 770 patients (77.7% men; mean age 66.3 +/- 5.2 years). A typical appearance of string sign was noted in nearly 60% of the patients. The vast majority (92.6%) were symptomatic. 479 (62.2%) patients underwent an open procedure, while 291 (38.8%) were treated endovascularly. The technical success rate for the endovascular procedures was 99%, while distal embolic protection devices were applied in most patients (66%). The 30 days procedural stroke rate was 2.1% and 2.4% for open and endovascular repair respectively. During a follow-up period spanning an average of approximately two years the ipsilateral cerebrovascular event rate was 5% and 1.2% for open and endovascular treatment-respectively. Twenty five (5.2%) restenosis or occlusions were reported for the open procedures, while 13 (5.4%) were also documented for endovascular repair. The current literature concerning the invasive treatment of CANO is weak and cannot support any evidence based recommendation. The necessity to intervene as well as the best therapeutic strategy remains controversial. This review shows that the interventionon symptomatic CANO may consist a relatively safe and effective therapeutic strategy with low perioperative cerebrovascular morbidity for both treatment modalities, although durability and long-term outcomes should be further affirmed. The low incidence of this entity and the dearth of clear evidence support the need for a large multicenter registry to clarify the absolute indications for intervention and define the best therapeutic approach.
机译:治疗颈动脉近阻塞(CANO)的治疗策略一直存在争议。这项研究的目的是审查有关动脉粥样硬化Cano的侵入性治疗的文献。使用PubMedand EMBASE数据库对1980年至2013年的英语医学文献进行了回顾,以查找涉及CANO开放或血管内管理​​的研究。该搜索确定了20篇描述CANO侵入性治疗的报告,涉及770例患者(男性77.7%;平均年龄66.3 +/- 5.2岁)。在近60%的患者中发现了典型的弦状体征。绝大多数(92.6%)是有症状的。 479例(62.2%)患者接受了开放手术,而291例(38.8%)接受了血管内治疗。血管内手术的技术成功率为99%,而大多数患者(66%)使用了远端栓塞保护装置。开放和血管内修复的30天手术卒中发生率分别为2.1%和2.4%。在平均约两年的随访期间,开放和血管内治疗的同侧脑血管事件发生率分别为5%和1.2%。据报道有25例(5.2%)的再狭窄或闭塞用于开放手术,而13例(5.4%)也被记录为血管内修复。当前有关CANO侵入性治疗的文献薄弱,不能支持任何基于证据的推荐。干预的必要性以及最佳的治疗策略仍然存在争议。这篇综述表明,对症状性CANO的干预可能包括相对安全有效的治疗策略,在两种治疗方式上围手术期脑血管病的发生率均较低,尽管应该进一步确认其持久性和长期疗效。该实体的低发生率和缺乏明确的证据支持需要建立大型的多中心注册中心,以明确干预的绝对指征并确定最佳治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号