首页> 外文期刊>Internal medicine journal >Use of low-dose mitozantrone to treat aggressive multiple sclerosis: a single-centre open-label study using patient self-assessment and clinical measures of multiple sclerosis status.
【24h】

Use of low-dose mitozantrone to treat aggressive multiple sclerosis: a single-centre open-label study using patient self-assessment and clinical measures of multiple sclerosis status.

机译:使用小剂量米托蒽醌治疗侵袭性多发性硬化症:一项单中心开放标签研究,使用患者自我评估和多发性硬化症状态的临床测量方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: There is significant evidence supporting the use of mitozantrone in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) but few data on the subtypes of MS that respond or which measures of disease status are most useful. AIMS: To assess the efficacy of low-dose (5 mg/m2 3 monthly) mitozantrone using patient self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ), expanded disability status score (EDSS), multiple sclerosis functional composite score (MSFC), and the fatigue severity scale (FSS). Then, to compare the responses of a subgroup of relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) patients to treatment, and to assess which measures of MS disease status are the most useful in a study of this type. METHOD: Thirty-one patients with definite (McDonald criteria) active MS were commenced on mitozantrone 5 mg/m2 every 3 months. EDSS, MSFC and FSS data collected before treatment and after 12 months were analysed. The SAQ was administered after at least 12 months of therapy. RESULTS: RRMS patients showed significantly more response to mitozantrone than SPMS patients in terms of MSFC (P = 0.02) and SAQ (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose mitozantrone was well tolerated and useful in active RRMS in the short term; however, mitozantrone did not display any useful activity in SPMS patients over this time interval or at the mitozantrone dose used. Patient perception of treatment is a worthwhile outcome measure and the MSFC is the most useful objective measure of MS status change in this type of study.
机译:背景:有大量证据支持米托蒽醌在多发性硬化症(MS)的治疗中的应用,但关于有反应的MS亚型或最有用的疾病状态测量方法的数据很少。目的:使用患者自我评估问卷(SAQ),扩大的残疾状态评分(EDSS),多发性硬化症功能综合评分(MSFC)和疲劳严重程度,评估小剂量(5 mg / m2 3每月一次)米托蒽醌的疗效规模(FSS)。然后,比较复发缓解型MS(RRMS)和继发进行性MS(SPMS)患者的亚组对治疗的反应,并评估在这种类型的研究中最有效的MS疾病状态指标。方法:每3个月对31例活动性MS确诊(麦当劳标准)的患者行米托蒽醌5 mg / m2治疗。分析治疗前和治疗12个月后收集的EDSS,MSFC和FSS数据。经过至少12个月的治疗后才给予SAQ。结果:就MSFC(P = 0.02)和SAQ(P = 0.01)而言,RRMS患者对米托蒽醌的反应明显高于SPMS患者。结论:低剂量米托蒽醌耐受性良好,在短期内可用于主动RRMS。但是,在此时间间隔内或以所使用的米托蒽醌剂量,米托蒽醌在SPMS患者中未显示任何有用的活性。病人对治疗的看法是一项值得评估的结果,而MSFC是这类研究中MS状态改变的最有用的客观指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号