...
首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Soil Science >Resistance to soil compaction of an Oxisol cultivated with coffee plants under different weed management systems.
【24h】

Resistance to soil compaction of an Oxisol cultivated with coffee plants under different weed management systems.

机译:在不同杂草管理系统下,用咖啡植物种植的Oxisol对土壤压实的抵抗力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The knowledge of the pressure levels that can be applied to the soil under different weed management system (WMS) is important for coffee plantations management. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of different weed management systems on the susceptibility to compaction of a Red-Yellow Latossol (Oxisol) (LVA) using soil support capacity (CSC) models. This study was carried out at the Epamig Research Farm in Patroc.nio, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, in a coffee (Coffea arabica) plantation using Ruby 1192 coffee variety in a 3.8.0.7 m spacing, planted in February 1999. Four WMS were used and the soil samples were collected in-between the rows under the following management systems: (1) no weed control (SC); (2) hoe-weeded (CM); (3) weed control with post-emergence herbicide Glyphosate (HP.S); (4) weed control with pre-emergence Oxyfluorfen (HPR.). Fifteen undisturbed soil samples from each system were collected (in the layers 0-3, 10-13 and 25-28 cm) in July 2004, with a total of 180 samples. The undisturbed soil samples were equilibrated at different moisture contents and subjected to the uniaxial compression test to obtain the soil CSC models. Results suggested that the support capacity of the LVA decreases in the centre of the inter rows in the following order: HPR. in the 0-3 cm layer > CM in the 10-13 cm layer >SC in the 0-3, 10-13, 25-28 cm layers=HP.S in the 0-3, 10-13, 25-28 cm layers=CM at 0-3 and 25-28 cm layers=HPR. in the 10-13 cm layer > HPR. in the 25-28 cm layer. Weed control with HPR. in the 25-28 cm layer was most susceptible, while HPR. in the 0-3 cm layer was most resistant to soil compaction. The management systems SC and HP.S in the 0-3, 10-13, 25-28 cm layers and the managements CM in the 0-3 and 25-28 cm layers and HPR. in the 10-13 cm layer were equally susceptible to soil compaction.
机译:了解在不同的杂草管理系统(WMS)下可以施加到土壤的压力水平对于咖啡种植园管理非常重要。这项研究的目的是使用土壤支持能力(CSC)模型评估不同杂草管理系统对红黄Latossol(Oxisol)(LVA)压实敏感性的影响。这项研究是在巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州Patroc.nio的Epamig研究农场的一种咖啡(阿拉伯咖啡)种植园中进行的,该种植园使用Ruby 1192咖啡品种,间距为3.8.0.7 m,种植于1999年2月。四个WMS使用以下管理系统,并在行间收集土壤样品:(1)无杂草防治(SC); (2)-草(CM); (3)用芽后除草剂草甘膦(HP.S)防治杂草; (4)用出苗前的氟草醚(HPR。)防治杂草。 2004年7月,从每个系统中收集了15个未受干扰的土壤样品(分别位于0-3、10-13和25-28厘米),共有180个样品。将未扰动的土壤样品在不同的水分含量下进行平衡,并进行单轴压缩试验,以获得土壤CSC模型。结果表明,LVA的支撑能力在中间行的中心按以下顺序降低:HPR。 0-3厘米层中的CM> 10-13厘米层中的CM> 0-3、10-13、25-28厘米中的SC = 0-3、10-13、25-28中的HP.S cm层= 0-3和25-28 cm处的CM = HPR。在10-13厘米层> HPR中。在25-28厘米的层中通过HPR控制杂草。在25-28 cm层中,HPR最易受感染。 0-3 cm层中的土壤对土壤压实最有抵抗力。 0-3、10-13、25-28 cm层中的管理系统SC和HP.S,0-3和25-28 cm层中的管理系统CM和HPR和HPR。在10-13厘米厚的土壤中同样容易受到土壤压实的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号