首页> 外文期刊>Internal medicine. >A five-year comparison of the renal protective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with non-diabetic nephropathy.
【24h】

A five-year comparison of the renal protective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with non-diabetic nephropathy.

机译:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对非糖尿病肾病患者肾脏保护作用的五年比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Evidence suggests that the effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition diminishes with time, resulting in increasing angiotensin II levels, the action of which can be inhibited by the addition of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). In the present study, the renal protective effects of ACE inhibitors and ARBs were compared over a five-year period in a prospective, randomized, open-blind study in 68 nondiabetic Japanese patients with elevated serum creatinine levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Japanese patients with renal insufficiency were randomly assigned to receive either an ACE inhibitor (benazepril 1.25 to 5 mg daily or trandolapril 0.5 to 4 mg daily) or ARB (candesartan 2 to 8 mg daily or losartan 25 to 100 mg daily) at the Kidney Disease Center at Saitama Medical School Hospital. The primary study endpoint was a change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between the baseline value and the last available value obtained during the five-year treatment period, as estimated by the Cockcraft-Gault equation. Secondary endpoints included the annual changes in GFR, serum creatinine level, urinary protein excretion, and blood pressure, as well as the rate of development of endstage renal disease. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the primary endpoint between the two groups. However, after 4 years, the decline in GFR in patients treated with ARBs was significantly greater than that seen in patients treated with an ACE inhibitor (p<0.05). Furthermore, the rate of introduction of dialysis therapy was also significantly greater in the ARB-treated patients (52.7% in ACE inhibitor and 81.2% in ARB group at year 5. p<0.01). CONCLUSION: While our data suggested that ARB, like ACE, treatment might slow the progression of renal dysfunction, it also pointed to the necessity to be alerted to the progression to endstage renal disease with longterm medication.
机译:目的:证据表明,血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)的抑制作用随时间而降低,导致血管紧张素II水平升高,可通过添加血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)来抑制其作用。在本研究中,在一项针对前瞻性,随机,开放式研究的五年期中,对68名血清肌酐水平升高的非糖尿病日本患者,比较了ACE抑制剂和ARB对肾脏的保护作用。患者和方法:将日本肾功能不全的患者随机分配为接受ACE抑制剂(贝那普利1.25至5 mg每天或trandolapril 0.5至4 mg每天)或ARB(坎地沙坦2至8 mg每天或氯沙坦25至100 mg每天)在Sa玉医学院附属医院的肾脏疾病中心。主要研究终点是根据Cockcraft-Gault方程估算的,在基线值和五年治疗期内获得的最后可用值之间的肾小球滤过率(GFR)变化。次要终点包括GFR,血清肌酐水平,尿蛋白排泄和血压的年度变化,以及终末期肾脏疾病的发生率。结果:两组之间的主要终点没有显着差异。然而,在4年后,接受ARB治疗的患者的GFR下降明显大于接受ACE抑制剂治疗的患者(p <0.05)。此外,在接受ARB治疗的患者中,透析治疗的引入率也显着更高(在第5年,ACEI抑制剂为52.7%,ARB组为81.2%,p <0.01)。结论:尽管我们的数据表明ARB与ACE一样,治疗可能会减慢肾功能不全的进展,但同时也指出需要长期服用药物以警惕晚期肾病的进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号