...
首页> 外文期刊>Internal medicine. >Severe Community-acquired Pneumonia in an Intensive Care Unit: Risk Factors for Mortality.
【24h】

Severe Community-acquired Pneumonia in an Intensive Care Unit: Risk Factors for Mortality.

机译:重症监护病房中严重的社区获得性肺炎:死亡率的危险因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective To evaluate severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) with regard to risk factors for mortality and to compare ICU patients with matched non-ICU patients to evaluate whether our judgement for ICU admission was appropriate or not.Materials and Methods During a 7-year period, all patients with CAP who were admitted to the ICU were examined. They underwent clinical and radiographic evaluations, and two commonly used severity of illness scores were also calculated using the Simplified Acute Physiological Score (SAPS) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II methods. To detect risk factors for ICU admission using existing guidelines, each study patient was matched with two patients hospitalized in a general medical ward.Results Seventy-two patients were identified during the study period. Their mean age was 72.9 years, and 35 patients (48.6%) subsequently died. For the univariate analysis, there were significant differences with the pulse rate >/=130/min, blood urea nitrogen >/=30 mg/dl, multilobar shadow, SAPS >/=13, APACHE II >/=23, and the occurrence of septic shock between the survivors and those who died. For the multivariate analysis, septic shock (p=0.0005, odds ratio of 26.6) and blood urea nitrogen >/=30 mg/dl (p=0.037, odds ratio of 5.38) were associated with mortality. Regarding the characteristics of different clinical predictions for ICU admission, the revised American Thoracic Society criteria might have been the most accurate.Conclusion Septic shock was associated with high mortality, which is a more accurate and higher predictor of mortality than was physical examination, laboratory or radiographic findings.
机译:目的评价重症监护病房(ICU)中重症社区获得性肺炎(SCAP)患者的死亡危险因素,并将ICU患者与相匹配的非ICU患者进行比较,以评估我们对ICU入院的判断是否适当材料与方法在7年的时间里,对所有入ICU的CAP患者进行了检查。他们进行了临床和影像学评估,还使用简化的急性生理评分(SAPS)和急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II方法计算了两个常用的疾病严重程度评分。为了使用现有指南检测ICU入院的危险因素,每名研究患者均与在普通病房住院的两名患者匹配。结果在研究期间确定了72名患者。他们的平均年龄为72.9岁,随后有35例患者(48.6%)死亡。对于单变量分析,在脉率> / = 130 / min,血尿素氮> / = 30 mg / dl,多叶阴影,SAPS> / = 13,APACHE II> / = 23和发生率方面存在显着差异。幸存者和死亡者之间的败血性休克。对于多变量分析,败血性休克(p = 0.0005,比值比为26.6)和尿素氮> / = 30 mg / dl(p = 0.037,比值比为5.38)与死亡率相关。关于ICU入院的不同临床预测的特征,修订后的美国胸科学会标准可能是最准确的。结论败血性休克与高死亡率相关,与物理检查,实验室检查或实验室检查相比,它是更准确,更高的死亡率预测指标。影像学发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号