首页> 外文期刊>International and Comparative Law Quarterly >THE ASEAN HUMAN RIGHTS DECLARATION AND THE IMPLICATIONS OF RECENT SOUTHEAST ASIAN INITIATIVES IN HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTION-BUILDING AND STANDARD-SETTING
【24h】

THE ASEAN HUMAN RIGHTS DECLARATION AND THE IMPLICATIONS OF RECENT SOUTHEAST ASIAN INITIATIVES IN HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTION-BUILDING AND STANDARD-SETTING

机译:东盟人权宣言以及东南亚近代倡议在人权机构建设和标准制定中的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On 18 November 2012 the 'Association of Southeast Asian Nations' (ASEAN) adopted the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (AHRD). ASEAN has existed since 1967 and as a result allows Southeast Asia to be identified as a 'region' comparable with other regions such as Africa, the Americas and Europe which have been seen as such in human rights terms for over 40 years. However, until recently Southeast Asia has not been involved in a process of regional human rights institutionalization which in other regions has been an important means of implementing international human rights treaty commitments adopted by their member-States in global forums. Furthermore, the ten States of ASEAN as a group are parties to relatively few of the principal international human rights standard-setting and monitoring regimes. Hence vesting ASEAN with a human rights mandate would seem to present an opportunity to enhance the range of human rights commitments to which ASEAN States are subject. However, after reviewing the 'ASEAN human rights mechanism' it is concluded that much recent ASEAN activity amounts either to political rhetoric or has potential to fragment the human rights norms recognized by those ASEAN States which are committed to international human rights treaties. For the ASEAN States which are relatively uncommitted to international human rights treaty regimes, participating in the ASEAN mechanism may reduce pressure to recognize international norms.
机译:2012年11月18日,“东南亚国家联盟”(ASEAN)通过了《 ASEAN人权宣言》(AHRD)。东盟自1967年成立以来,因此可以将东南亚确定为与非洲,美洲和欧洲等其他地区相提并论的“地区”,而非洲,美洲和欧洲在人权方面已被视为40多年。但是,直到最近,东南亚还没有参与区域人权制度化的进程,而在其他区域,东南亚地区一直是执行其成员国在全球论坛上通过的国际人权条约承诺的重要手段。此外,东盟十个国家作为一个整体参加了相对较少的主要国际人权标准制定和监测制度。因此,赋予东盟人权职权似乎为扩大东盟国家所承担的人权承诺提供了机会。但是,在审查了“东盟人权机制”之后,得出的结论是,东盟的许多近期活动要么是政治言论,要么有可能使那些致力于国际人权条约的东盟国家所承认的人权规范断裂。对于相对不参与国际人权条约制度的东盟国家而言,参加东盟机制可减轻承认国际准则的压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号