...
首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >An assessment of the validity of spectral entropy as a measure of sedation statein mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
【24h】

An assessment of the validity of spectral entropy as a measure of sedation statein mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

机译:评估频谱熵作为机械通气危重患者镇静状态的有效性的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the Entropy Module (GE Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland), a device to measure hypnosis in anesthesia, is a valid measure of sedation state in critically ill patients by comparing clinically assessed sedation state with Spectral Entropy DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Teaching hospital general ICU. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 30 intubated, mechanically ventilated patients without primary neurological diagnoses or drug overdose receiving continuous sedation. INTERVENTIONS: Monitoring of EEG and fEMG activity via forehead electrodes for up to 72h and assessments of conscious level using a modified Ramsay Sedation Scale. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: 475 trained observer assessments were made and compared with concurrent Entropy numbers. Median State (SE) and Response (RE) Entropy values decreased as Ramsay score increased, but wide variation occurred, especially in Ramsay 4-6 categories. Discrimination between different sedation scores [mean (SEM) P(K) value: RE 0.713 (0.019); SE 0.710 (0.019)] and between lighter (Ramsay 1-3) vs.deeper (Ramsay 4-6) sedation ranges was inadequate [P(K): RE 0.750 (0.025); SE 0.748 (0.025)]. fEMG power decreased with increasing Ramsay score but was often significant even at Ramsay 4-6 states. Frequent "on-off" effects occurred for both RE and SE, which were associated with fEMG activity.Values switched from low to high values even in deeply sedated patients. High Entropy values during deeper sedation were strongly associated with simultaneous high relative fEMG powers. CONCLUSIONS: Entropy of the frontal EEG does not discriminate sedation state adequately for clinical use in ICU patients. Facial EMG is a major confounder in clinical sedation ranges.
机译:目的:通过将临床评估的镇静状态与光谱熵设计进行比较,以评估熵模块(一种用于测量麻醉中催眠的装置)是否是重症患者镇静状态的有效量度方法:前瞻性观察性研究。地点:教学医院普通ICU。患者和参加者:30例无插管,机械通气的患者,无原发性神经系统诊断或药物过量,接受持续镇静。干预措施:使用改良的Ramsay镇静量表,通过前额电极监测脑电图和fEMG活性长达72小时,并评估意识水平。测量和结果:进行了475次训练有素的观察者评估,并将其与并发的熵值进行比较。中间值(SE)和响应(RE)的熵值随Ramsay分数的增加而降低,但发生了很大的变化,尤其是在Ramsay 4-6类中。镇静分数之间的区别[平均值(SEM)P(K)值:RE 0.713(0.019); SE 0.710(0.019)]和较轻(Ramsay 1-3)与较深(Ramsay 4-6)之间的镇静范围不足[P(K):RE 0.750(0.025); SE 0.748(0.025)]。 fEMG的能力随拉姆齐得分的增加而降低,但即使在拉姆齐4-6个州也常常很明显。 RE和SE经常发生“开-关”效应,这与fEMG活性有关。即使是镇静剂较深的患者,其值也从低值切换到高值。在更深的镇静过程中,较高的熵值与同时较高的相对fEMG功率密切相关。结论:额叶脑电图的熵不能充分区分ICU患者的镇静状态以用于临床。面部肌电图是临床镇静范围的主要混杂因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号