首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >On the utility of diagnostic instruments for pediatric delirium in critical illness: an evaluation of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale, the Delirium Rating Scale 88, and the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised R-98.
【24h】

On the utility of diagnostic instruments for pediatric delirium in critical illness: an evaluation of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale, the Delirium Rating Scale 88, and the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised R-98.

机译:关于小儿ir妄在严重疾病中的诊断工具的实用性:小儿麻醉药紧急Deli妄量表,the妄评估量表88和the妄评估量表修订的R-98的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: Delirium is a poor-prognosis neuropsychiatric disorder. Pediatric delirium (PD) remains understudied, particularly at pediatric intensive care units (PICU). Although the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale, the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS-88), and the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised (DRS-R-98) are available, none have been validated for use in PICU settings. The aim of the present study was to investigate the use of the DRS/PAED instruments as diagnostic tools for PD in the PICU. METHODS: A prospective panel study was conducted, under circumstances of routine clinical care, investigating the diagnostic properties of the PAED, DRS-88, and DRS-R-98 in PICU patients at a tertiary university medical center. A total of 182 non-electively admitted, critically ill pediatric patients, aged 1-17 years, were included between November 2006 and February 2010. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. Three psychometric properties were analyzed: (1) internal consistency (2) proportion of items not rateable, and (3) discriminative ability. RESULTS: The PAED could be completed in 144 (93.5%) patients, much more frequently than either the DRS-88 (66.9%) or the DRS-R-98 (46.8%). Compared with the clinical gold standard diagnosis of delirium, the PAED had a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 98% (AUC 0.99). The optimal PAED cutoff score as a screening instrument in this PICU setting was 8. Cronbach's alpha was 0.89; discriminative ability was high. CONCLUSIONS: The PAED is a valid instrument for PD in critically ill children, given its reliance on routinely rateable observational signs and symptoms.
机译:目的:Deli妄是一种预后不良的神经精神疾病。儿科(妄(PD)的研究仍不足,特别是在小儿重症监护室(PICU)。尽管提供了小儿麻醉性紧急Deli妄(PAED)量表,r妄评定量表(DRS-88)和经修订的Rating妄评定量表(DRS-R-98),但都没有经过验证可用于PICU设置。本研究的目的是调查使用DRS / PAED仪器作为PICU中PD的诊断工具。方法:在常规临床护理的情况下,进行了前瞻性小组研究,以调查大专院校医学中心对PICU患者的PAED,DRS-88和DRS-R-98的诊断特性。在2006年11月至2010年2月之间,共纳入了182例1-17岁的非择治性危重儿科患者。计算了敏感性,特异性和受体工作特征(ROC)曲线。分析了三个心理测量属性:(1)内部一致性(2)无法评估的项目比例,以及(3)判别能力。结果:可以完成144(93.5%)位患者的PAED,比DRS-88(66.9%)或DRS-R-98(46.8%)的发生率要高得多。与the妄的临床金标准诊断相比,PAED的敏感性为91%,特异性为98%(AUC 0.99)。在此PICU设置中,作为筛查工具的最佳PAED截止评分为8。Cronbach's alpha为0.89;判别能力高。结论:PAED是重症儿童PD的有效工具,因为它依赖于常规可分级的观察症状和体征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号