首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >Physiologic evaluation of non-invasive pressure support ventilation in trauma patients with acute respiratory failure.
【24h】

Physiologic evaluation of non-invasive pressure support ventilation in trauma patients with acute respiratory failure.

机译:创伤性急性呼吸衰竭患者无创压力支持通气的生理评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of noninvasive (face mask) versus invasive (endotracheal tube) equal pressure values on blood gases and respiratory pattern and to evaluate the feasibility of using mask ventilation after the short term physiologic study. DESIGN: Open, prospective, physiologic study and uncontrolled clinical study. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a trauma center. PATIENTS: 22 intubated trauma patients were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were intubated and ventilated in a pressure support mode (IPSV) of 13.5 +/- 1.5 cmH2O and a post end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5.8 +/- 2.57 cmH2O. After a T-piece trial to assess patient's ability to breath spontaneously, patients were switched over to noninvasive pressure support (NIPSV). The pressure levels were set as during IPSV. Blood gases and respiratory parameters were measured during IPSV, during the T-piece trial, and after 1 h of NIPSV. After the physiologic study, all patients were asked if they wished to continue on NIPSV. The patient's subjective compliance with IPSV and NIPSV was measured by means of an arbitrary score. A successful outcome was defined as no need for reintubation. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: IPSVand NIPSV showed no statistical differences for blood gas and respiratory parameters by using the same values of PSV (13 +/- 5 vs 12.8 +/- 1.7 cmH2O, NS) and PEEP (5.8 +/- 2.5 and 5.2 +/- 2.2 cmH2O NS). The median length of time on NIPSV was 47 h (range 6 to 144). All patients wished to continue on NIPSV, but 9 patients (40.9%) were reintubated after 54 +/- 54 h. Six of them died after 36 +/- 13 days while still on mechanical ventilation. There was no statistically significant difference in compliance score between IPSVand NIPSV. CONCLUSIONS: NIPSV is comparable to IPSV in terms of blood gases and respiratory pattern. The clinical uncontrolled study indicates that NIPSV could be used in selected trauma patients.
机译:目的:研究无创(面罩)与有创(气管内导管)等压值对血气和呼吸模式的有效性,并评估短期生理研究后使用面罩通气的可行性。设计:开放,前瞻性,生理学研究和不受控制的临床研究。地点:创伤中心的重症监护室。患者:22位插管创伤患者进行了研究。干预措施:以13.5 +/- 1.5 cmH2O的压力支持模式(IPSV)和5.8 +/- 2.57 cmH2O的呼气后压力(PEEP)对患者进行插管和通气。在进行T形试验以评估患者自发呼吸的能力之后,将患者切换到无创压力支持(NIPSV)。如IPSV期间那样设定压力水平。在IPSV期间,T形试验期间以及NIPSV 1小时后测量血气和呼吸参数。进行生理学研究后,询问所有患者是否希望继续使用NIPSV。通过任意评分来测量患者对IPSV和NIPSV的主观依从性。成功的结果定义为无需重新插管。测量和结果:IPSV和NIPSV使用相同的PSV值(13 +/- 5 vs 12.8 +/- 1.7 cmH2O,NS)和PEEP(5.8 +/- 2.5和5.2 +)显示血气和呼吸参数无统计学差异。 /-2.2 cmH2O NS)。 NIPSV的中位时间长度为47小时(范围从6到144)。所有患者都希望继续使用NIPSV,但在54 +/- 54小时后重新插管了9例患者(40.9%)。他们中有六人在36 +/- 13天后仍处于机械通气时死亡。 IPSV和NIPSV之间的依从性评分没有统计学上的显着差异。结论:就血液气体和呼吸模式而言,NIPSV与IPSV相当。临床非对照研究表明,NIPSV可用于某些创伤患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号