首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >Plasma levels of the three endothelial-specific proteins von Willebrand factor, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and thrombomodulin do not predict the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome.
【24h】

Plasma levels of the three endothelial-specific proteins von Willebrand factor, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and thrombomodulin do not predict the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

机译:三种内皮特异性蛋白von Willebrand因子,组织因子途径抑制剂和血栓调节蛋白的血浆水平不能预测急性呼吸窘迫综合征的发展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the plasma levels of three endothelial-specific proteins, von Willebrand factor (vWF), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) and thrombomodulin (TM) may be useful in predicting the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DESIGN: Blood samples were obtained from normal healthy volunteers and on the first day from patients at risk for ARDS and those with ARDS. Daily sequential measurements of vWF and TFPI were performed in two patients. SETTING: Normal subjects were employees at Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri. Patients at risk and those with ARDS were patients admitted to the medical and surgical floors and the intensive care units at St. Louis University Hospital. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Plasma levels of vWF, TFPI and TM were measured in 27 normals, and on day 1 in 15 patients at risk for ARDS and 18 patients with ARDS from different etiologic factors. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Plasma levels of vWF were significantly elevated in the at-risk (p < 0.01) and ARDS group (p < 0.001) as compared to normals but did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05). Plasma levels of TFPI were not significantly different between the normal and the at-risk group (p > 0.05); however, they were significantly elevated in ARDS as compared with at-risk and normal groups (p < 0.001). Levels of TM were significantly increased in the at-risk group as compared to normals (p < 0.01) but were not significantly different from the ARDS group (p > 0.05). Eight patients at risk progressed to develop ARDS. A vWF level of > 300% in patients at risk was 62% sensitive and 71% specific for predicting the development of ARDS with a positive predictive value of only 34%. TFPI levels were normal in 7 of the 8 patients who developed ARDS. A TM level of > 100 ng/ml in patients at risk was 50% sensitive and 57% specific with a positive predictive value of merely 8% for development of ARDS. There was no significant difference in the mean plasma levels of the three proteins on day 1 in patients at risk who developed ARDS as compared with those who did not develop ARDS. There was also no difference in mean plasma levels of the three proteins in patients with ARDS from sepsis as compared with ARDS from other etiologies. Plasma levels of vWF and TFPI correlated significantly. CONCLUSION: Plasma levels of vWF, TFPI and TM did not appear to serve as useful markers for predicting ARDS in patients at risk.
机译:目的:确定三种血管内皮特异性蛋白,血管性血友病因子(vWF),组织因子途径抑制剂(TFPI)和血栓调节蛋白(TM)的血浆水平是否可用于预测急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的发展。设计:从正常健康志愿者那里采集血液样本,并在第一天从有ARDS风险的患者和ARDS患者中采集血样。每天对两名患者进行vWF和TFPI的连续测量。地点:正常受试者是密苏里州圣路易斯市圣路易斯大学医院的雇员。高危患者和ARDS患者是进入圣路易斯大学医院的内科和外科手术室以及重症监护室的患者。患者和受试者:在27名正常人中以及在第1天时,对15名有ARDS危险的患者和18名来自不同病因的ARDS患者进行了血浆vWF,TFPI和TM的测定。测量和结果:与正常人相比,处于危险中(p <0.01)和ARDS组(p <0.001)的血浆vWF水平显着升高,但两组之间无显着差异(p> 0.05)。正常组和高风险组之间的血浆TFPI水平无显着差异(p> 0.05);然而,与高风险和正常组相比,ARDS中它们的含量显着升高(p <0.001)。与正常人相比,高危组的TM水平显着增加(p <0.01),但与ARDS组无显着差异(p> 0.05)。八名处于危险中的患者发展为ARDS。风险患者中> 300%的vWF水平对于预测ARDS的发展敏感为62%,特异性为71%,阳性预测值仅为34%。在发生ARDS的8例患者中,有7例的TFPI水平正常。有风险的患者的TM水平> 100 ng / ml,对ARDS的敏感度为50%,特异性为57%,阳性预测值仅为8%。有风险的患ARDS的患者与未患ARDS的患者相比,第1天三种蛋白质的平均血浆水平无显着差异。与其他病因的ARDS相比,败血症的ARDS患者的三种蛋白的平均血浆水平也没有差异。 vWF和TFPI的血浆水平显着相关。结论血浆vWF,TFPI和TM的水平似乎不能作为预测危险患者ARDS的有用指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号