...
首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >Pros and cons of using biomarkers versus clinical decisions in start and stop decisions for antibiotics in the critical care setting
【24h】

Pros and cons of using biomarkers versus clinical decisions in start and stop decisions for antibiotics in the critical care setting

机译:在重症监护环境中使用生物标志物与临床决策在抗生素开始和终止决策中的利弊

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) frequently receive prolonged or even unnecessary antibiotic therapy, which selects for antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Over the last decade there has been great interest in biomarkers, particularly procalcitonin, to reduce antibiotic exposure. Methods: In this narrative review, we discuss the value of biomarkers and provide additional information beyond clinical evaluation in order to be clinically useful and review the literature on sepsis biomarkers outside the neonatal period. Both benefits and limitations of biomarkers for clinical decision-making are reviewed. Results: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown the safety and efficacy of procalcitonin to discontinue antibiotic therapy in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. In contrast, there is limited utility of procalcitonin for treatment initiation or withholding therapy initially. In addition, an algorithm using procalcitonin for treatment escalation has been ineffective and is probably associated with poorer outcomes. Little data from interventional studies are available for other biomarkers for antibiotic stewardship, except for C-reactive protein (CRP), which was recently found to be similarly effective and safe as procalcitonin in a randomized controlled trial. We finally briefly discuss biomarker-unrelated approaches to reduce antibiotic duration in the ICU, which have shown that even without biomarker guidance, most patients with sepsis can be treated with relatively short antibiotic courses of approximately 7 days. Conclusions: In summary, there is an ongoing unmet need for biomarkers which can reliably and early on identify patients who require antibiotic therapy, distinguish between responders and non-responders and help to optimize antibiotic treatment decisions among critically ill patients. Available evidence needs to be better incorporated in clinical decision-making.
机译:简介:重症监护病房(ICU)的患者经常接受延长甚至不必要的抗生素治疗,该治疗选择耐抗生素的细菌。在过去的十年中,人们对生物标记物,特别是降钙素原,对减少抗生素的暴露产生了极大的兴趣。方法:在这篇叙述性综述中,我们讨论了生物标志物的价值,并提供了除临床评估以外的其他信息,以使其具有临床价值,并回顾了新生儿期以外败血症生物标志物的文献。综述了生物标志物对临床决策的益处和局限性。结果:几项随机对照试验(RCT)显示,降钙素原对严重败血症或败血性休克患者中止抗生素治疗的安全性和有效性。相反,降钙素原最初用于治疗起始或停药治疗的用途有限。此外,使用降钙素原进行治疗升级的算法无效,可能与较差的预后相关。除了C反应蛋白(CRP)以外,很少有干预研究的数据可用于抗生素管理的其他生物标记物,CRP在最近的一项随机对照试验中被发现与降钙素同样有效且安全。我们最后简要地讨论了减少ICU中抗生素持续时间的生物标志物无关方法,这些方法表明,即使没有生物标志物指导,大多数脓毒症患者也可以接受相对较短的抗生素疗程(大约7天)。结论:总而言之,对生物标志物的需求仍未得到满足,这些标志物可以可靠,尽早地确定需要抗生素治疗的患者,区分反应者和非反应者,并帮助优化危重患者的抗生素治疗决策。现有证据需要更好地纳入临床决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号