首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >Enteral omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
【24h】

Enteral omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

机译:成年急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的肠内ω-3脂肪酸补充:一项荟萃分析和序贯分析的随机对照试验的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Controversy remains as to whether enteral supplementation of ω-3 fatty acids (FA) could improve outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Thus, we did a meta-analysis and aimed to investigate the benefit and harm of enteral ω-3 FA supplementation in adult patients with ARDS. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar were searched to find relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing enteral ω-3 FA supplementation with a control or placebo intervention in adult patients with ARDS were included. The primary outcome was all-cause 28-day mortality. We used the Cochrane Collaboration methodology. Results: Seven RCTs with 955 adult patients qualified for inclusion, and all the selected trials were considered as at high risk of bias. The use of enteral ω-3 FA did not significantly reduce all-cause 28-day mortality [relative risk (RR), 0.90; 95 % confidence intervals (CI), 0.68-1.18; p = 0.44; I 2 = 31 %; random effects]. Trial sequential analysis indicated lack of firm evidence for a 20 % RR reduction in all-cause 28-day mortality. PaO2/FiO2 ratio was significantly increased in the ω-3 FA group on day 4 [weighted mean difference (WMD), 45.14; 95 % CI, 16.77-73.51; p = 0.002; I 2 = 86 %; random effects] and day 7 (WMD, 33.10; 95 % CI, 1.67-64.52; p = 0.04; I 2 = 88 %; random effects). Meta-analysis using a random effects model showed no significant differences in ventilator-free days (VFD) (WMD, 2.47 days; 95 % CI, -2.85 to 7.79; p = 0.36; I 2 = 91 %) or intensive care unit-free days (ICU) (WMD, 2.31 days; 95 % CI, -2.34 to 6.97; p = 0.33; I 2 = 89 %) between the two groups. Conclusions: Among patients with ARDS, enteral supplementation of ω-3 FA seemed ineffective regarding all-cause 28-day mortality, VFD, and ICU-free days. Routine use of enteral ω-3 FA cannot be recommended based on the available evidence.
机译:目的:肠内补充ω-3脂肪酸(FA)是否可以改善急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的结局仍有争议。因此,我们进行了荟萃分析,旨在研究补充成人ω-FA肠内ω-3FA的利弊。方法:检索包括PubMed,Embase,对照试验的Cochrane登记簿和Google Scholar的数据库以查找相关文章。纳入了在成人ARDS患者中比较肠内ω-3FA补充剂与对照或安慰剂干预的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是全天28天死亡率。我们使用了Cochrane协作方法。结果:7项RCT与955名成年患者符合入组条件,所有入选的试验均被认为具有偏倚的高风险。使用肠内ω-3FA并不能显着降低全天28天死亡率[相对危险度(RR)为0.90; 95%置信区间(CI)为0.68-1.18; p = 0.44; I 2 = 31%;随机效果]。试验顺序分析表明,缺乏确凿的证据表明全天28天死亡率可降低20%RR。在第4天,ω-3FA组的PaO2 / FiO2比显着增加[加权平均差异(WMD),45.14; 95%CI,16.77-73.51; p = 0.002; I 2 = 86%;第7天(WMD,33.10; 95%CI,1.67-64.52; p = 0.04; I 2 = 88%;随机影响)。使用随机效应模型的荟萃分析显示,无呼吸机天数(VFD)(WMD为2.47天; 95%CI为-2.85至7.79; p = 0.36; I 2 = 91%)或重症监护病房-两组之间的自由活动日(ICU)(WMD,2.31天; 95%CI,-2.34至6.97; p = 0.33; I 2 = 89%)。结论:在ARDS患者中,就全因28天死亡率,VFD和无ICU天数而言,肠内补充ω-3FA似乎无效。根据现有证据,不建议常规使用肠内ω-3FA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号