首页> 外文期刊>Intelligence: A Multidisciplinary Journal >The 'Flynn Effect' and Flynn's paradox
【24h】

The 'Flynn Effect' and Flynn's paradox

机译:“弗林效应”与弗林悖论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

1. Lynn on naming Richard is correct. Calling massive IQ gains over time the "Flynn Effect" was an accident of history, a label Charles Murray coined in The Bell Curve in 1994. It is not a verdict a court would have been likely to hand down if it had an eye for the historical record. It is only fair to note that Murray's rationale did not attribute historical priority: "We call it 'the Flynn effect' because of psychologist James Flynn's pivotal role in focusing attention on it, but the phenomenon was identified in the 1930s when testers began to notice that IQ scores rose with every successive year after a test was first standardized." (Herrnstein & Murray, 1994, p. 307).
机译:林恩(Lynn)命名理查德(Richard)是正确的。 1994年,查尔斯·默里(Charles Murray)在“钟形曲线”(Bell Curve)中创造了一个标签,称“弗林效应”是随着时间的流逝而获得的大量智商增长。这并不是法院如果愿意的话,就不会做出判决。历史记录。只能公平地指出,穆雷的理论依据并未赋予历史优先权:“我们称其为“弗林效应”,因为心理学家詹姆斯·弗林(James Flynn)在专注于此方面起着举足轻重的作用,但这种现象在1930年代被测试者开始注意到时才发现。首次标准化测试后,IQ分数逐年上升。” (Herrnstein&Murray,1994,第307页)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号