首页> 外文期刊>Integrative physiological and behavioral science: the official journal of the Pavlovian Society >Cognition and Self-Control: Cognitive Control of Painful Sensory Input
【24h】

Cognition and Self-Control: Cognitive Control of Painful Sensory Input

机译:认知与自我控制:痛苦感觉输入的认知控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Eighty Ss were first tested for base-level response to a pain-producing stimulus and then were re-tested on the same pain stimulus after receiving 1 of 8 experimental treatments. The 8 treatments were arranged in a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design: presence or absence of hypnotic induction procedure; presence or absence of instructions for anesthesia; and presence or absence of demands for honest reports. Neither the hypnotic-induction procedure nor the demands for honesty affected the Ss' reports of the degree of pain experienced. The anesthesia instructions-"think of the hand as numb and insensitive as if it were a piece of rubber..."- produced an equal degree of pain reduction in hypnotic and non-hypnotic Ss and in Ss who were and those who were not exposed to demands for honesty. The results indicate that (a) Ss' reports of pain are less affected by demands for honesty and are more closely related to their actual experiences than has been previously assumed and (b) instructions which direct Ss to exercise cognitive control over painful sensory input are effective (with or without 'hypnosis') in reducing the experience of pain.
机译:首先测试80个Ss对产生疼痛的刺激的基本水平反应,然后在接受8个实验治疗中的1个后,对相同的疼痛刺激进行重新测试。这8种治疗以2 x 2 x 2因子设计进行安排:是否存在催眠诱导程序;是否有麻醉指示;是否存在对诚实举报的要求。催眠程序和诚实的要求都不会影响Ss关于痛苦程度的报告。麻醉说明-“像麻木一样感觉手麻木和不敏感...”-在催眠和非催眠的Ss以及曾经和不曾经历过的Ss中,产生了相同程度的疼痛减轻暴露于诚实的要求。结果表明:(a)Ss的疼痛报告受诚实要求的影响较小,并且与他们的实际经历相比,比以前假定的要少,并且(b)指导Ss对疼痛的感官输入进行认知控制的指令是有效(有或没有“催眠”作用)减轻疼痛感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号