...
首页> 外文期刊>Injury >Healing of closed femoral shaft fractures treated with the AO unreamed femoral nail. A comparative study with the AO reamed femoral nail.
【24h】

Healing of closed femoral shaft fractures treated with the AO unreamed femoral nail. A comparative study with the AO reamed femoral nail.

机译:AO股骨无钉治疗股骨干闭合性骨折。 AO股骨钉的对比研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Out of a hundred and seven closed femoral fractures, fifty-three were treated with the unreamed femoral nail and fifty-four with the reamed femoral nail. There were four delayed unions in the Unreamed Femoral Nail group (UFN) and three in the Reamed Femoral Nail group (RFN). There were no cases of infection or malunion. Implant failure was the cause of implant conversion in one patient of the UFN group. Healing time of the femoral fractures was 19.2 weeks in the UFN group and 19.6 weeks in the RFN group.Due to the significant decrease in operating time with the UFN (70 min) in comparison with the RFN (125 min) and the possible risk of posttraumatic pulmonary oedema (ARDS) with reaming techniques, the authors recommend the UFN for the treatment of acute closed femoral shaft fractures.
机译:在一百零七例闭合性股骨骨折中,有五十三例用未扩张的股骨钉治疗,五十四例用扩孔的股骨钉治疗。无钉股骨钉组(UFN)有四个延迟的联合,而扩孔股钉钉组(RFN)有三个。没有感染或畸形畸形的病例。植入失败是UFN组中一名患者植入转化的原因。 UFN组的股骨骨折愈合时间为19.2周,RFN组的为19.6周。由于与RFN相比,UFN的手术时间(70分钟)显着减少(70分钟),并且可能发生骨折的风险创伤后肺水肿(ARDS)采用扩孔技术,作者推荐使用UFN治疗急性闭合性股骨干骨折。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号