首页> 外文期刊>Injury >Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with two different minimal invasive angle-stable plates: Biomechanical comparison studies on cadaveric bones
【24h】

Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with two different minimal invasive angle-stable plates: Biomechanical comparison studies on cadaveric bones

机译:两种不同的微创角稳定钢板治疗假体周围股骨骨折:尸体骨骼的生物力学比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction: The introduction of fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis techniques has provided us a further means to treat periprosthetic femoral fractures. The goal of this experimental study is to evaluate the biomechanical properties and stability of treated periprosthetic fractures when using two different plate systems, which vary in the locking mechanism and the screw placement (monocortical or bicortical) with respect to the prosthesis stem.Materials and methods: Using five pairs of formalin-fixed femora, a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture was treated either with a 13-hole LISS~R titanium plate using four monocortical periprosthetic screws or with a non-contact bridging plate (NCB) DF~R plate using bicortical angle-stable blocked screws positioned ventrally or dorsally to the prosthesis stem. Bones were loaded under axial and cyclic compression with a progressively increased load until failure. Displacement at the osteotomy gap was measured during loading using an ultra-sound measuring system.Results: The mean displacement in the region of the fracture gap was not significantly different at any time during the experiments for the two models. The mean force resulting in subsequent model failure was similar in both models; the failure morphology varied slightly between the models, however. Four of the five LISS~R models exhibited either a tear-out of the monocortical screws or a decortication from the bony shaft of the cortical lamella surrounding the screws. On the other side, two of the NCB models showed macroscopically visible fissures along the osteosynthesis plates at the height of the osteotomy gap, and were hence considered implant failures. Only one NCB model showed tear-out of the bicortically placed screws.Conclusion: Bicortical screw placement provides more stable anchoring when compared to monocortical screw fixation. However, in relation to the amount of motion at the osteotomy gap and to failure loads, stabilisation of periprosthetic femoral fr...
机译:简介:固定角钢板固定技术的引入为我们提供了治疗假体周围股骨骨折的另一种方法。本实验研究的目的是评估使用两种不同的钢板系统时所治疗的假体周围骨折的生物力学性能和稳定性,这些系统在假体杆的锁定机制和螺钉位置(单皮层或双皮层)方面有所不同。 :使用五对福尔马林固定的股骨,使用13孔LISS〜R钛板(使用四个单皮质假体螺钉)或非接触桥接板(NCB)DF〜R板(使用双皮质)治疗Vancouver B1假体周围骨折固定在假体杆的腹侧或背侧的角度稳定的固定螺钉。骨骼在轴向和循环压缩下承受载荷,载荷逐渐增加直至失效。结果:在两个模型的实验过程中,在任何时候,骨折间隙区域的平均位移在任何时候都没有显着差异。导致随后模型失效的平均力在两个模型中均相似。但是,模型之间的破坏形态略有不同。在五个LISS〜R模型中,有四个表现出单皮质螺钉的撕裂或围绕螺钉的皮质薄片的骨干轴脱壳。另一方面,两个NCB模型在截骨间隙的高度沿沿骨合成板的肉眼可见裂痕,因此被认为是植入失败。结论:双皮质螺钉置入与单皮质螺钉固定相比,可提供更稳定的锚固。然而,相对于截骨间隙处的运动量和失败负荷,假体周围股骨的稳定...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号